Public acceptance of euthanasia in Europe: a survey study in 47 countries

被引:88
作者
Cohen, Joachim [1 ,2 ]
Van Landeghem, Paul [1 ,2 ]
Carpentier, Nico [3 ,4 ]
Deliens, Luc [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Brussel, Univ Ghent, End Of Life Care Res Grp, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Vrije Univ Brussel, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
[3] Vrije Univ Brussel, SCOM, B-1040 Brussels, Belgium
[4] Univ Loughborough, Dept Social Sci, Loughborough, Leics, England
[5] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, EMGO Inst, Dept Publ & Occupat Hlth, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Euthanasia; Public opinion; Cross-national comparison; Survey; Eastern Europe; Western Europe; OF-LIFE DECISIONS; PHYSICIAN-ASSISTED SUICIDE; GENERAL-POPULATION; EASTERN-EUROPE; HEALTH DIVIDE; ATTITUDES; END;
D O I
10.1007/s00038-013-0461-6
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
In recent years, the European euthanasia debate has become more intense, and the practice was legalized in the Netherlands, Belgium, and Luxembourg. We aimed to determine the current degree of public acceptance of euthanasia across Europe and investigate what factors explain differences. Data were derived from the 2008 wave of the European Values Survey (EVS), conducted in 47 European countries (N = 67,786, response rate = 69 %). Acceptance of euthanasia was rated on a 1-10 scale. Relatively high acceptance was found in a small cluster of Western European countries, including the three countries that have legalized euthanasia and Denmark, France, Sweden and Spain. In a large part of Europe public acceptance was relatively low to moderate. Comparison with the results of the previous EVS wave (1999) suggests a tendency towards a polarization in Europe, with most of Western Europe becoming more permissive and most of Eastern Europe becoming less permissive. There is roughly a West-East division in euthanasia acceptance among the European public, making a pan-European policy approach to the issue difficult.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 156
页数:14
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], GESIS TECHN REP
[2]   Attitudes of Michigan physicians and the public toward legalizing physician-assisted suicide and voluntary euthanasia [J].
Bachman, JG ;
Alcser, KH ;
Doukas, DJ ;
Lichtenstein, RL ;
Corning, AD ;
Brody, H .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 334 (05) :303-309
[3]   The world's major religions' points of viewon end-of-life decisions in the intensive care unit [J].
Bulow, Hans-Henrik ;
Sprung, Charles L. ;
Reinhart, Konrad ;
Prayag, Shirish ;
Du, Bin ;
Armaganidis, Apostolos ;
Abroug, Fekri ;
Levy, Mitchell M. .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2008, 34 (03) :423-430
[4]  
Campbell C., 2000, UNESCO COURIER, P37
[5]   Self-perceived health in East and West Europe: Another European health divide [J].
Carlson, P .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1998, 46 (10) :1355-1366
[6]   The European health divide: a matter of financial or social capital? [J].
Carlson, P .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2004, 59 (09) :1985-1992
[7]   Influence of physicians' life stances on attitudes to end-of-life decisions and actual end-of-life decision-making in six countries [J].
Cohen, J. ;
van Delden, J. ;
Mortier, F. ;
Lofmark, R. ;
Norup, M. ;
Cartwright, C. ;
Faisst, K. ;
Canova, C. ;
Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. ;
Bilsen, J. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2008, 34 (04) :247-253
[8]   Trends in acceptance of euthanasia among the general public in 12 European countries (1981-1999) [J].
Cohen, Joachim ;
Marcoux, Isabelle ;
Bilsen, Johan ;
Deboosere, Patrick ;
van der Wal, Gerrit ;
Deliens, Luc .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2006, 16 (06) :663-669
[9]   European public acceptance of euthanasia: Socio-demographic and cultural factors associated with the acceptance of euthanasia in 33 European countries [J].
Cohen, Joachim ;
Marcoux, Isabelle ;
Bilsen, Johan ;
Deboosere, Patrick ;
van der Wal, Gerrit ;
Deliens, Luc .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2006, 63 (03) :743-756
[10]  
Crumley B, 2008, FRENCH EUTHANASIA CA