Communication and folk psychology

被引:46
作者
Breheny, R [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Linguist, London WC1E 6BT, England
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00307.x
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Prominent accounts of language use (those of Grice, Lewis, Stalnaker, Sperber and Wilson among others) have viewed basic communicative acts as essentially involving the attitudes of the participating agents. Developmental data poses a dilemma for these accounts, since it suggests children below age four are competent communicators but would lack the ability to conceptualise communication if philosophers and linguists are right about what communication is. This paper argues that this dilemma is quite serious and that these prominent accounts would be undermined if an adequate more minimal alternative were available. Just such a minimalist account of communication is offered, drawing on ideas from relevance theory and situation theory.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 107
页数:34
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1975, MINNESOTA STUDIES PH
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, JOINT ATTENTION ITS
[3]  
ASHER N, 1999, SEMANTICS PRAGMATICS
[4]   Infants parse dynamic action [J].
Baldwin, DA ;
Baird, JA ;
Saylor, MM ;
Clark, MA .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 72 (03) :708-717
[5]   DOES THE AUTISTIC-CHILD HAVE A THEORY OF MIND [J].
BARONCOHEN, S ;
LESLIE, AM ;
FRITH, U .
COGNITION, 1985, 21 (01) :37-46
[6]  
Barwise J., 1989, SITUATION LOGIC
[7]  
Barwise Jon., 1983, SITUATIONS ATTITUDES
[8]   Two reasons to abandon the false belief task as a test of theory of mind [J].
Bloom, P ;
German, TP .
COGNITION, 2000, 77 (01) :B25-B31
[9]  
Bloom P., 2002, CHILDREN LEARN MEANI
[10]   The current state of (radical) pragmatics in the cognitive sciences [J].
Breheny, R .
MIND & LANGUAGE, 2002, 17 (1-2) :169-187