Transition Optimization for a VTOL Tail-Sitter UAV

被引:53
作者
Li, Boyang [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Jingxuan [3 ]
Zhou, Weifeng [1 ,2 ]
Wen, Chih-Yung [1 ,2 ]
Low, Kin Huat [4 ]
Chen, Chih-Keng [5 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Interdisciplinary Div Aeronaut & Aviat Engn, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Temasek Labs, Singapore 119077, Singapore
[4] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Mech & Aerosp Engn, Singapore 639798, Singapore
[5] Natl Taipei Univ Technol, Dept Vehicle Engn, Taipei 10608, Taiwan
关键词
Flight experiments; tail-sitter; trajectory optimization; transition; unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV); LEVEL-FLIGHT; AERIAL; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1109/TMECH.2020.2983255
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This article focuses on the transition process optimization for a vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) tail-sitter unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). For VTOL UAVs that can fly with either hover or cruise mode, transition refers to the intermediate phases between these two modes. This work develops a transition strategy with the trajectory optimization method. The strategy is a reference maneuver enabling the vehicle to perform transition efficiently by minimizing the cost of energy and maintaining a small change of altitude. The simplified three-degree-of-freedom longitudinal aerodynamic model is used as a dynamic constraint. The transition optimization problem is then modeled by nonlinear programming and solved by the collocation method to obtain the reference trajectory of the pitch angle and throttle offline. Simulations with the Gazebo simulator and outdoor flight experiments are carried out with the optimized forward (hover cruise) and backward (cruise hover) transition solutions. The simulation and experimental results show that the optimized transition strategy enables the vehicle to finish transition with less time and change of altitude compared with that by using traditional linear transition methods.
引用
收藏
页码:2534 / 2545
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
[11]   A Hybrid MAV for Ingress and Egress of Urban Environments [J].
Green, William E. ;
Oh, Paul Y. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS, 2009, 25 (02) :253-263
[12]   Classifications, applications, and design challenges of drones: A review [J].
Hassanalian, M. ;
Abdelkefi, A. .
PROGRESS IN AEROSPACE SCIENCES, 2017, 91 :99-131
[13]   Flight-test results of autonomous airplane transitions between steady-level and hovering flight [J].
Johnson, Eric N. ;
Wu, Allen ;
Neidboefer, James C. ;
Kannan, Suresh K. ;
Turbe, Michael A. .
JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2008, 31 (02) :358-370
[14]   Development and Application of Controller for Transition Flight of Tail-Sitter UAV [J].
Jung, Yeunduk ;
Shim, David Hyunchul .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & ROBOTIC SYSTEMS, 2012, 65 (1-4) :137-152
[15]   Linear vs Nonlinear MPC for Trajectory Tracking Applied to Rotary Wing Micro Aerial Vehicles [J].
Kamel, Mina ;
Burri, Michael ;
Siegwart, Roland .
IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2017, 50 (01) :3463-3469
[16]   Design and Implementation of a Hybrid UAV With Model-Based Flight Capabilities [J].
Ke, Yijie ;
Wang, Kangli ;
Chen, Ben M. .
IEEE-ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS, 2018, 23 (03) :1114-1125
[17]   An Introduction to Trajectory Optimization: How to Do Your Own Direct Collocation [J].
Kelly, Matthew .
SIAM REVIEW, 2017, 59 (04) :849-904
[18]   Transition between Level Flight and Hovering of a Tail-Sitter Vertical Takeoff and Landing Aerial Robot [J].
Kita, Koichi ;
Konno, Atsushi ;
Uchiyama, Masaru .
ADVANCED ROBOTICS, 2010, 24 (5-6) :763-781
[19]   Real-time motion planning with a fixed-wing UAV using an agile maneuver space [J].
Levin, Joshua M. ;
Nahon, Meyer ;
Paranjape, Aditya A. .
AUTONOMOUS ROBOTS, 2019, 43 (08) :2111-2130
[20]   Agile maneuvering with a small fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicle [J].
Levin, Joshua M. ;
Paranjape, Aditya A. ;
Nahon, Meyer .
ROBOTICS AND AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS, 2019, 116 :148-161