Comparative analysis of long-term results of high-tech external beam therapy and combined radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer and high risk of progression

被引:0
作者
Demeshko, P. D. [1 ]
Krasny, S. A. [1 ]
Stsepanovich, E. A. [1 ]
Polyakov, S. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] NN Alexandrov Natl Canc Ctr Belarus, Lesnoy 223040, Minsk Region, BELARUS
来源
ONKOUROLOGIYA | 2019年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
prostate cancer; combined radiation therapy; external beam radiotherapy; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; DOSE-ESCALATION; RECURRENCE;
D O I
10.17650/1726-9776-2019-15-1-76-83
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background. Patients suffering from prostate cancer (PCa) with a high risk of progression need the most active treatment tactics. Escalation of radiation dose, larger daily fractions radiation therapy (including high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-BT)) is a promising approach to the treatment of PCa. Objective of the study. Comparative assessment of the long-term treatment results of patients with PCa with a poor prognosis after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and combined radiation therapy, depending on risk factors. Materials and methods. 207 patients who received a course EBRT and HDR-BT with EBRT (combined RT) on a radical program for the first detected PCa at the N.N. Alexandrov National Cancer Center of Belarus in 2013-2015 inclusive. All patients were belonged to the group of high and very high risk of progression according to the criteria of the NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network), all were treated with neoadjuvated hormone therapy (medical or surgical castration). The patients were stratified into two groups: HDR-BT with EBRT and EBRT. When conducting combined RT, HDR-brachytherapy was performed in single fraction with a dose of 11.5 Gy, for EBRT it was used as a conventional fractionation (single dose of 2 Gy, total - 44 Gy) and hypofractionation (single dose of 3 Gy, total - 36 Gy). Patient that were not who not included in the combined RT protocol were treated with EBRT under a radical program in a total dose of 78-80 Gy. Results. It was established that in the group of patients after EBRT the median survival was not achieved, the 5-year adjusted survival (AS) was 85.2 +/- 5.6 %. In the combined RT group, the median survival was also not reached, the 5-year-old AS was 92.2 +/- 5.9 %. It was found that for the patients with a Gleason score of 7 or more, a significant difference in the AS index was obtained in favor of the HDR-BT with EBRT: the 5-year AS of patients of this subgroup who were exposed to combined RT was 84.6 +/- 9.8 %, while after EBRT, the 5-year-old AS was 71.0 +/- 11.2 %. In the subgroup of patients with Gleason sum 7-10, combined RT was associated with statistically significantly better long-term results in compared with EBRT. Conclusion. The application of the method of combined RT for patients suffering from PCa with a high risk is characterized with satisfactory long-term treatment results.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 83
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Pellizzon ACA, 2011, INT J CLIN EXP MED, V4, P43
[2]   Fractionation and late rectal toxicity [J].
Brenner, DJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 60 (04) :1013-1015
[3]   High-risk prostate cancer-classification and therapy [J].
Chang, Albert J. ;
Autio, Karen A. ;
Roach, Mack, III ;
Scher, Howard I. .
NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 11 (06) :308-323
[4]  
Demeshko P. D, 2015, BIOCH RECURRENCE PRO
[5]  
Deore S. M., 1993, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, V169, P521
[6]   Preoperative model for predicting prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy using percent of biopsy tissue with cancer, biopsy Gleason grade and serum prostate specific antigen [J].
Freedland, SJ ;
Terris, MK ;
Csathy, GS ;
Kane, CJ ;
Amling, CL ;
Presti, JC ;
Dorey, F ;
Aronson, WJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (06) :2215-2220
[7]   Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: Optimal Therapy in Older Patients [J].
Froehner, Michael ;
Wirth, Manfred P. .
DRUGS & AGING, 2013, 30 (12) :959-967
[8]   Predicting recurrence after radical prostatectomy for patients with high risk prostate cancer [J].
Grossfeld, GD ;
Latini, DM ;
Lubeck, DP ;
Mehta, SS ;
Carroll, PR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (01) :157-163
[9]   Dose selection for prostate cancer patients based on dose comparison and dose response studies [J].
Hanks, GE ;
Hanlon, AL ;
Pinover, WH ;
Horwitz, EM ;
Price, RA ;
Schultheiss, T .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 46 (04) :823-832
[10]   Modeling of α/β for late rectal toxicity from a randomized phase II study: conventional versus hypofractionated scheme for localized prostate cancer [J].
Marzi, Simona ;
Saracino, Biancamaria ;
Petrongari, Maria G. ;
Arcangeli, Stefano ;
Gomellini, Sara ;
Arcangeli, Giorgio ;
Benassi, Marcello ;
Landoni, Valeria .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL & CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2009, 28