The search engine manipulation effect (SEME) and its possible impact on the outcomes of elections

被引:263
作者
Epstein, Robert [1 ]
Robertson, Ronald E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Amer Inst Behav Res & Technol, Vista, CA 92084 USA
关键词
search engine manipulation effect; search rankings; Internet influence; voter manipulation; digital bandwagon effect; CANDIDATE NAME-ORDER; SOCIAL-INFLUENCE; MEDIA BIAS; BEHAVIOR; POSITION; WEB; EXPOSURE; POLITICS; USERS;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.1419828112
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Internet search rankings have a significant impact on consumer choices, mainly because users trust and choose higher-ranked results more than lower-ranked results. Given the apparent power of search rankings, we asked whether they could be manipulated to alter the preferences of undecided voters in democratic elections. Here we report the results of five relevant double-blind, randomized controlled experiments, using a total of 4,556 undecided voters representing diverse demographic characteristics of the voting populations of the United States and India. The fifth experiment is especially notable in that it was conducted with eligible voters throughout India in the midst of India's 2014 Lok Sabha elections just before the final votes were cast. The results of these experiments demonstrate that (i) biased search rankings can shift the voting preferences of undecided voters by 20% or more, (ii) the shift can be much higher in some demographic groups, and (iii) search ranking bias can be masked so that people show no awareness of the manipulation. We call this type of influence, which might be applicable to a variety of attitudes and beliefs, the search engine manipulation effect. Given that many elections are won by small margins, our results suggest that a search engine company has the power to influence the results of a substantial number of elections with impunity. The impact of such manipulations would be especially large in countries dominated by a single search engine company.
引用
收藏
页码:E4512 / E4521
页数:10
相关论文
共 91 条
[71]   PREVALENCE AND MODERATORS OF THE CANDIDATE NAME-ORDER EFFECT EVIDENCE FROM STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTIONS IN CALIFORNIA [J].
Pasek, Josh ;
Schneider, Daniel ;
Krosnick, Jon A. ;
Tahk, Alexander ;
Ophir, Eyal ;
Milligan, Claire .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2014, 78 (02) :416-439
[72]   Valuing thoughts, ignoring behavior: The introspection illusion as a source of the bias blind spot [J].
Pronin, Emily ;
Kugler, Matthew B. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 43 (04) :565-578
[73]  
Purcell K., 2012, Pew Research Center's Internet American Life Project
[74]  
Rogers D, 2012, US HOUSE SENATE ELEC
[75]  
Rutenberg J, 2012, OBAMA CAMPAIGN ENDGA
[76]  
Silverstein C., 1999, SIGIR Forum, V33, P6, DOI 10.1145/331403.331405
[77]   Bandwagon and Underdog Effects and the Possibility of Election Predictions [J].
Simon, Herbert A. .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1954, 18 (03) :245-253
[78]  
Smith A., 2012, PEW RES CTR INTERNET
[79]  
Smith Aaron., 2011, PEW RES CTR INTERNET
[80]  
Spink A, 2001, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC, V52, P226, DOI 10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::AID-ASI1591>3.3.CO