Race, segregation, and postal employment: New evidence on spatial mismatch

被引:32
作者
Boustan, Leah Platt [1 ,3 ]
Margo, Robert A. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Econ, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
METROPOLITAN DECENTRALIZATION; AMERICAN GHETTO; HYPOTHESIS; DISCRIMINATION; BLACKS; IMPACT; BAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.jue.2008.08.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The spatial mismatch hypothesis posits that employment decentralization isolated urban blacks from work opportunities. This paper focuses on one large employer that has remained in the central city over the twentieth century-the U.S. Postal Service. We find that blacks substitute towards postal work as other employment opportunities leave the city circa 1960. The response is particularly strong in segregated areas, where black neighborhoods are clustered near the central business district. Furthermore, this pattern only holds for non-mail carriers, many of whom work in central processing facilities. More recently, the relationship between black postal employment and segregation has declined, suggesting that spatial mismatch has become less important over time. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Ananat E. O., 2007, 13343 NBER
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1962, AM DILEMMA NEGRO PRO
[4]  
BAUMSNOW N, 2007, URBAN EMPLOYMENT DEC
[5]  
Becker Gary S., 2010, EC DISCRIMINATION
[6]  
BROOKS RRW, 2002, LAW EC RES PAPER SER, V28
[7]  
Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2007, OCC OUTL HDB 2006 07
[8]   Residential segregation and socioeconomic outcomes - When did ghettos go bad? [J].
Collins, WJ ;
Margo, RA .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2000, 69 (02) :239-244
[9]   The housing market impact of state-level anti-discrimination laws, 1960-1970 [J].
Collins, WJ .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2004, 55 (03) :534-564
[10]   Are ghettos good or bad? [J].
Cutler, DM ;
Glaeser, EL .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1997, 112 (03) :827-872