Measurement properties of the QuickDASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) outcome measure and cross-cultural adaptations of the QuickDASH: a systematic review

被引:120
作者
Kennedy, Carol A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Beaton, Dorcas E. [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Smith, Peter [1 ,6 ,7 ]
Van Eerd, Dwayne [1 ,8 ]
Tang, Kenneth [1 ,2 ,9 ]
Inrig, Taucha [2 ]
Hogg-Johnson, Sheilah [1 ,7 ]
Linton, Denise [2 ]
Couban, Rachel [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Work & Hlth, Toronto, ON M5G 2E9, Canada
[2] St Michaels Hosp, Mobil Program Clin Res Unit, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Phys Therapy, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Grad Dept Rehabil Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Dept Occupat Sci & Occupat Therapy, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Monash Univ, Alfred Ctr, Sch Publ Heath & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[7] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Waterloo, Sch Publ Hlth & Hlth Syst, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[9] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院; 澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Upper extremity; Psychometrics; Systematic review; Measurement properties; Best evidence synthesis; STATUS MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS; METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY; COSMIN CHECKLIST; RESPONSIVENESS; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDITY; WORKERS; NECK; RELIABILITY; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-013-0362-4
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
To identify and synthesize evidence for the measurement properties of the QuickDASH, a shortened version of the 30-item DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) instrument. This systematic review used a best evidence synthesis approach to critically appraise the measurement properties [using COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN)] of the QuickDASH and cross-cultural adaptations. A standard search strategy was conducted between 2005 (year of first publication of QuickDASH) and March 2011 in MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL. The search identified 14 studies to include in the best evidence synthesis of the QuickDASH. A further 11 studies were identified on eight cross-cultural adaptation versions. Many measurement properties of the QuickDASH have been evaluated in multiple studies and across most of the measurement properties. The best evidence synthesis of the QuickDASH English version suggests that this tool is performing well with strong positive evidence for reliability and validity (hypothesis testing), and moderate positive evidence for structural validity testing. Strong negative evidence was found for responsiveness due to lower correlations with global estimates of change. Information about the measurement properties of the cross-cultural adaptation versions is still lacking, or the available information is of poor overall methodological quality.
引用
收藏
页码:2509 / 2547
页数:39
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Aaronson N, 2002, QUAL LIFE RES, V11, P193
[2]   Reliability and validity of Turkish version of the patient rated tennis elbow evaluation [J].
Altan, Lale ;
Ercan, Ilker ;
Konur, Saniye .
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 30 (08) :1049-1054
[3]   The new COSMIN guidelines confront traditional concepts of responsiveness [J].
Angst, Felix .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2011, 11
[4]   How sharp is the short QuickDASH? A refined content and validity analysis of the short form of the disabilities of the shoulder, arm and hand questionnaire in the strata of symptoms and function and specific joint conditions [J].
Angst, Felix ;
Goldhahn, Joerg ;
Drerup, Susann ;
Flury, Matthias ;
Schwyzer, Hans-Kaspar ;
Simmen, Beat R. .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2009, 18 (08) :1043-1051
[5]  
[Anonymous], SCANDINAVIAN J WORK
[6]  
[Anonymous], QUALITY LIFE RES
[7]  
[Anonymous], QUALITY LIFE RES
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2008, EVIDENCE BASED REHAB
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2008, HLTH MEASUREMENT SCA, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199231881.001.0001
[10]   The Six-Item CTS Symptoms Scale and Palmar Pain Scale in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome [J].
Atroshi, Isam ;
Lyren, Per-Erik ;
Ornstein, Ewald ;
Gummesson, Christina .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2011, 36A (05) :788-794