Sex Differences in the Management and Outcomes of Ontario Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction

被引:36
|
作者
Abdel-Qadir, Husam M. [1 ,2 ]
Ivanov, Joan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Austin, Peter C. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Tu, Jack V. [2 ,3 ,4 ,6 ]
Dzavik, Vladimir [1 ,2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Network, Peter Munk Cardiac Ctr, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Inst Clin Evaluat Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Cardiol, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Heart & Stroke Lewar Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
RAPID RISK STRATIFICATION; SUPPRESS ADVERSE OUTCOMES; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; EARLY IMPLEMENTATION; ACC/AHA GUIDELINES; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; MORTALITY; PREDICTION; CRUSADE; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cjca.2012.09.020
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Sex differences in the management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) have not been well studied. Methods: We examined mortality and revascularization rates of 9750 patients with CS between 1992 and 2008 in the Ontario Myocardial Infarction Database. Men and women were compared in the entire cohort and in subgroups divided by age (aged < 75 years vs aged >= 75 years) and revascularization availability at presenting hospital. Logistic regression was used to determine the adjusted effect of sex on mortality and to determine predictors of revascularization. Results: The incidence of CS was higher in women (3.7% of female vs 2.7% of male AMI patients; P < 0.001). Women with CS were older than men (mean age: 75.5 vs 71.1 years; P < 0.001) and less likely to present to revascularization-capable sites (16% vs 19.2%; P < 0.001). Unadjusted 1-year mortality rates were higher in women (80.3% vs 75.4%; P < 0.001). Women were less likely to be revascularized (12.6% vs 17.6%; P < 0.001) and less likely to be transferred when they presented to nonrevascularization sites (11.3% vs 14.2%; P < 0.001). The strongest predictor of revascularization was presentation to a revascularization-capable site (odds ratio, 17.69; P < 0.001). After regression adjustment, there were no significant differences in mortality or revascularization between the sexes. Conclusion: Women with CS are older than men with CS and are less likely to present to revascularization-capable sites. This accounts for the lower unadjusted revascularization rates among women compared with men. However, there are no significant sex-based differences in adjusted mortality rates.
引用
收藏
页码:691 / 696
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SEX DIFFERENCES IN THE MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOMES OF ONTARIO PATIENTS WITH CARDIOGENIC SHOCK COMPLICATING MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
    Abdel-Qadir, H. M.
    Ivanov, J.
    Austin, P. C.
    Tu, J. V.
    Dzavik, V.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 28 (05) : S402 - S402
  • [2] Sex Differences in Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Presenting With Cardiogenic Shock
    Elgendy, Islam Y.
    Wegermann, Zachary K.
    Li, Shuang
    Mahtta, Dhruv
    Grau-Sepulveda, Maria
    Smilowitz, Nathaniel R.
    Gulati, Martha
    Garratt, Kirk N.
    Wang, Tracy Y.
    Jneid, Hani
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2022, 15 (06) : 642 - 652
  • [3] Sex Disparities in the Management and Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Young
    Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra
    Ya'Qoub, Lina
    Singh, Mandeep
    Bell, Malcolm R.
    Gulati, Rajiv
    Cheungpasitporn, Wisit
    Sundaragiri, Pranathi R.
    Miller, Virginia M.
    Jaffe, Allan S.
    Gersh, Bernard J.
    Holmes, David R., Jr.
    Barsness, Gregory W.
    CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2020, 13 (10) : E007154
  • [4] TRENDS IN THE MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOMES OF CARDIOGENIC SHOCK COMPLICATING ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
    Matsumoto, Sen
    Sakata, Yasuhiko
    Shimizu, Masahiko
    Suna, Shinichirou
    Usami, Masaya
    Sasaki, Tatsuya
    Nishino, Masami
    Komuro, Issei
    Sato, Hiroshi
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (10)
  • [5] Management of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction
    Van Herck, Jozef L.
    Claeys, Marc J.
    De Paep, Rudi
    Van Herck, Paul L.
    Vrints, Christiaan J.
    Jorens, Philippe G.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE, 2015, 4 (03) : 278 - 297
  • [6] Management of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction
    Menon, V
    Hochman, JS
    HEART, 2002, 88 (05) : 531 - 537
  • [7] Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction
    De Luca, Leonardo
    Mistrulli, Raffaella
    Scirpa, Riccardo
    Thiele, Holger
    De Luca, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (06)
  • [8] Management of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: A review
    Shah, Ashish H.
    Puri, Rishi
    Kalra, Ankur
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 42 (04) : 484 - 493
  • [9] Update on the management of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction
    Vrints, Christiaan J. M.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE, 2020, 9 (02) : 99 - 101
  • [10] Outcomes with Invasive vs Conservative Management of Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction
    Bangalore, Sripal
    Gupta, Navdeep
    Guo, Yu
    Lala, Anuradha
    Balsam, Leora
    Roswell, Robert O.
    Reyentovich, Alex
    Hochman, Judith S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 128 (06): : 601 - 608