Impact of Social Punishment on Cooperative Behavior in Complex Networks

被引:170
作者
Wang, Zhen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xia, Cheng-Yi [4 ,5 ]
Meloni, Sandro [6 ]
Zhou, Chang-Song [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Moreno, Yamir [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Dept Phys, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Ctr Nonlinear Studies, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Inst Computat & Theoret Studies, Beijing Hong Kong Singapore Joint Ctr Nonlinear &, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Tianjin Univ Technol, Minist Educ, Key Lab Comp Vis & Syst, Tianjin 300191, Peoples R China
[5] Tianjin Univ Technol, Tianjin Key Lab Intelligence Comp & Novel Softwar, Tianjin 300191, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Zaragoza, Inst Biocomputat & Phys Complex Syst BIFI, E-50009 Zaragoza, Spain
[7] Univ Zaragoza, Dept Theoret Phys, E-50009 Zaragoza, Spain
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
EVOLUTIONARY PRISONERS-DILEMMA; GAME; EMERGENCE;
D O I
10.1038/srep03055
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Social punishment is a mechanism by which cooperative individuals spend part of their resources to penalize defectors. In this paper, we study the evolution of cooperation in 2-person evolutionary games on networks when a mechanism for social punishment is introduced. Specifically, we introduce a new kind of role, punisher, which is aimed at reducing the earnings of defectors by applying to them a social fee. Results from numerical simulations show that different equilibria allowing the three strategies to coexist are possible as well as that social punishment further enhance the robustness of cooperation. Our results are confirmed for different network topologies and two evolutionary games. In addition, we analyze the microscopic mechanisms that give rise to the observed macroscopic behaviors in both homogeneous and heterogeneous networks. Our conclusions might provide additional insights for understanding the roots of cooperation in social systems.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Social games in a social network [J].
Abramson, G ;
Kuperman, M .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2001, 63 (03)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, EVOLUTIONARY DYNAMIC, DOI DOI 10.2307/J.CTVJGHW98
[3]   Enhancement of cooperation in highly clustered scale-free networks [J].
Assenza, Salvatore ;
Gomez-Gardenes, Jesus ;
Latora, Vito .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2008, 78 (01)
[4]   Emergence of scaling in random networks [J].
Barabási, AL ;
Albert, R .
SCIENCE, 1999, 286 (5439) :509-512
[5]   Punishing and abstaining for public goods [J].
Brandt, H ;
Hauert, C ;
Sigmund, K .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2006, 103 (02) :495-497
[6]   Models of cooperation based on the Prisoner's Dilemma and the Snowdrift game [J].
Doebeli, M ;
Hauert, C .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2005, 8 (07) :748-766
[7]   Winners don't punish [J].
Dreber, Anna ;
Rand, David G. ;
Fudenberg, Drew ;
Nowak, Martin A. .
NATURE, 2008, 452 (7185) :348-351
[8]   Asymmetric cost in snowdrift game on scale-free networks [J].
Du, W. -B. ;
Cao, X. -B. ;
Hu, M. -B. ;
Wang, W. -X. .
EPL, 2009, 87 (06)
[9]  
Erdos P., 1959, PUBL MATH-DEBRECEN, V6, P290, DOI DOI 10.5486/PMD.1959.6.3-4.12
[10]   SOME EXPERIMENTAL GAMES [J].
FLOOD, MM .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1958, 5 (01) :5-26