Can we use existing guidance to support the development of robust real-world evidence for health technology assessment/payer decision-making?

被引:9
|
作者
Capkun, Gorana [1 ]
Corry, Sorcha [2 ]
Dowling, Oonagh [1 ]
Kolaei, Fatemeh Asad Zadeh Vosta [1 ]
Takyar, Shweta [1 ]
Furtado, Claudia [3 ,4 ]
Jonsson, Pall [5 ]
Kleinermans, Diane [6 ]
Lambert, Laurie [7 ]
Schiel, Anja [8 ]
Facey, Karen [9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Novartis Pharmaceut, Basel, Switzerland
[2] Novartis Oncol, E Hanover, NJ USA
[3] INFARMED, HTA Div, Lisbon, Portugal
[4] Univ Nova Lisboa, Natl Sch Publ Hlth, Lisbon, Portugal
[5] NICE, Data & Real World Evidence, London, England
[6] INAMI, Drugs Reimbursement, Brussels, Belgium
[7] CADTH, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[8] NoMA, Regulatory & Pharmacoecon Stat, Oslo, Norway
[9] FIPRA, Brussels, Belgium
[10] Univ Edinburgh, Usher Inst, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
real-world data; real-world evidence; guidance; health technology assessment; payers; TASK-FORCE; SECONDARY DATA; ASSESSMENT HTA; RECOMMENDATIONS;
D O I
10.1017/S0266462322000605
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Advances in the digitization of health systems and expedited regulatory approvals of innovative treatments have led to increased potential for the use of real-world data (RWD) to generate real-world evidence (RWE) to complement evidence from clinical trials. However, health technology assessment (HTA) bodies and payers have concerns about the ability to generate RWE of sufficient quality to be pivotal evidence of relative treatment effectiveness. Consequently, there is a growing need for HTA bodies and payers to develop guidance for the industry and other stakeholders about the use of RWD/RWE to support access, reimbursement, and pricing. We therefore sought to (i) understand barriers to the use of RWD/RWE by HTA bodies and payers; (ii) review potential solutions in the form of published guidance; and (iii) review findings with selected HTA/payer bodies. Four themes considered key to shaping the generation of robust RWE for HTA bodies and payers were identified as: (i) data (availability, governance, and quality); (ii) methodology (design and analytics); (iii) trust (transparency and reproducibility); and (iv) policy and partnerships. A range of guidance documents were found from trusted sources that could address these themes. These were discussed with HTA experts. This commentary summarizes the potential guidance solutions available to help resolve issues faced by HTA decision-makers in the adoption of RWD/RWE. It shows that there is alignment among stakeholders about the areas that need improvement in the development of RWE and that the key priority to move forward is better collaboration to make data usable for multiple purposes.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Real-world evidence to support health technology assessment and payer decision making: is it now or never?
    Murphy, Linda A.
    Akehurst, Ron
    Cunningham, David
    de Pouvourville, Gerard
    Sola-Morales, Oriol
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2025, 41 (01)
  • [2] Development of a Canadian Guidance for reporting real-world evidence for regulatory and health-technology assessment (HTA) decision-making
    Tadrous, Mina
    Aves, Theresa
    Fahim, Christine
    Riad, Jessica
    Mittmann, Nicole
    Prieto-Alhambra, Daniel
    Rivera, Donna R.
    Chan, Kelvin
    Lix, Lisa M.
    Kent, Seamus
    Dawoud, Dalia
    Guertin, Jason Robert
    Mcdonald, James Ted
    Round, Jeff
    Klarenbach, Scott
    Stanojevic, Sanja
    Vera, Mary A. De
    Strumpf, Erin
    Platt, Robert W.
    Husein, Farah
    Lambert, Laurie
    Hayes, Kaleen N.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 176
  • [3] Real-World Evidence for Regulatory Decision-Making: Guidance From Around the World
    Burns, Leah
    Le Roux, Nadege
    Kalesnik-Orszulak, Robert
    Christian, Jennifer
    Hukkelhoven, Mathias
    Rockhold, Frank
    O'Donnell, John
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 44 (03) : 420 - 437
  • [4] COMMON THREADS: REGULATORY AND HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT (HTA) AGENCIESAVTM RECOMMENDATIONS ON REAL-WORLD EVIDENCE (RWE) USE IN DECISION-MAKING
    Jaksa, A.
    Gatto, N.
    Case, A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 : S315 - S316
  • [5] Real-world evidence for regulatory decision-making: updated guidance from around the world
    Burns, Leah
    Le Roux, Nadege
    Kalesnik-Orszulak, Robert
    Christian, Jennifer
    Dudinak, Jennifer
    Rockhold, Frank
    Khozin, Sean
    O'Donnell, John
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [6] Payer perceptions of the use of real-world evidence in oncology-based decision making
    Brixner, Diana
    Biskupiak, Joseph
    Oderda, Gary
    Burgoyne, Douglas
    Malone, Daniel C.
    Arondekar, Bhakti
    Niyazov, Alexander
    JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE & SPECIALTY PHARMACY, 2021, 27 (08): : 1096 - 1105
  • [7] Transferability of real-world data across borders for regulatory and health technology assessment decision-making
    Jaksa, Ashley
    Arena, Patrick J.
    Chan, Kelvin K. W.
    Ben-Joseph, Rami H.
    Jonsson, Pall
    Campbell, Ulka B.
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [8] Real-world endpoints to support regulatory decision-making
    Christian, Jennifer B.
    Warren, Edward J.
    Cameron, David
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2020, 29 : 427 - 427
  • [9] Structure and Content of a Taxonomy to Support the Use of Real-World Evidence by Health Technology Assessment Practitioners and Healthcare Decision Makers
    Murphy, Linda A.
    Akehurst, Ron
    Sola-Morales, Oriol
    Cunningham, David
    Mestre-Ferrandiz, Jorge
    Franklin, Matthew
    de Pouvourville, Gerard
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (04) : 20 - 31
  • [10] CONTEXT MATTERS - A TAXONOMY OF REAL-WORLD DATA AND EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT HTA DECISION-MAKING
    Murphy, L. A.
    Mestre-Ferrandiz, J.
    Sola-Morales, O.
    de Pouvourville, G.
    Cunningham, D.
    Corry, S.
    Akehurst, R.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 : S622 - S622