Cardiac output estimation with a new Doppler device after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery

被引:68
作者
Chand, Rajesh [1 ]
Mehta, Yatin [1 ]
Trehan, Naresh [1 ]
机构
[1] Escorts Heart Inst & Res Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care, New Delhi 110025, India
关键词
continuous-wave Doppler; noninvasive cardiac output; noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring; OPCAB; USCOM; thermodilution technique;
D O I
10.1053/j.jvca.2005.05.024
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare cardiac output (CO), stroke volume (SV), and cardiac index (CI) as estimated with a new, non-invasive Doppler device (Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor [USCOM]; USCOM Ltd, Sydney, Australia) with those measured with the bolus thermodilution (TD) technique. Design: Prospective nonrandomized study. Setting: Postcardiac surgery recovery unit of a tertiary cardiac center. Participants: Fifty patients after off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery. Measurement and Main Results: Both right-sided and left-sided CO were estimated with a USCOM continuous-wave (CW) Doppler device, and CO was determined with the bolus TD technique performed in triplicate. On comparing the right-sided CO, SV, and Cl with those of TD, the mean bias was 0.03 L/min, 1.6 mL, and 0.02 L/min/m(2), respectively. The comparison of left-sided CO, SV, and Cl with those of TD revealed a means bias of 0.14 L/min, 1.0mL, and 0.08 L/min/m(2), respectively. Conclusion: This study showed excellent agreement between the values for CO, SV, and Cl as determined with USCOM and TD. Since there was only 1 time period for CO estimation in each patient with both methods, the stability of this correlation needs to be further investigated over time. (C) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 319
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Haemodynamic measurements (Continuous cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance) in critically ill patients: Transoesophageal Doppler versus continuous thermodilution [J].
Baillard, C ;
Cohen, Y ;
Fosse, JP ;
Karoubi, P ;
Hoang, P ;
Cupa, M .
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1999, 27 (01) :33-37
[2]  
BAZARAL MG, 1992, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V73, P21
[3]   PREOPERATIVE OPTIMIZATION OF CARDIOVASCULAR HEMODYNAMICS IMPROVES OUTCOME IN PERIPHERAL VASCULAR-SURGERY - A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL [J].
BERLAUK, JF ;
ABRAMS, JH ;
GILMOUR, IJ ;
OCONNOR, SR ;
KNIGHTON, DR ;
CERRA, FB .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1991, 214 (03) :289-299
[4]   PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF SURVIVOR VALUES OF CARDIAC INDEX, OXYGEN DELIVERY, AND OXYGEN-CONSUMPTION AS RESUSCITATION END-POINTS IN SEVERE TRAUMA [J].
BISHOP, MH ;
SHOEMAKER, WC ;
APPEL, PL ;
MEADE, P ;
ORDOG, GJ ;
WASSERBERGER, J ;
WO, CJ ;
RIMLE, DA ;
KRAM, HB ;
UMALI, R ;
KENNEDY, F ;
SHULESHKO, J ;
STEPHEN, CM ;
SHORI, SK ;
THADEPALLI, HD .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1995, 38 (05) :780-787
[5]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[6]   Pulmonary artery flotation catheters - A statement by the American College of Chest Physicians and the American Thoracic Society [J].
Chernow, B .
CHEST, 1997, 111 (02) :261-262
[7]   The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients [J].
Connors, AF ;
Speroff, T ;
Dawson, NV ;
Thomas, C ;
Harrell, FE ;
Wagner, D ;
Desbiens, N ;
Goldman, L ;
Wu, AW ;
Califf, RM ;
Fulkerson, WJ ;
Vidaillet, H ;
Broste, S ;
Bellamy, P ;
Lynn, J ;
Knaus, WA .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (11) :889-897
[8]   Measurement of cardiac output after cardiac surgery by a new transesophageal Doppler device [J].
Jaeggi, P ;
Hofer, CK ;
Klaghofer, R ;
Fodor, P ;
Genoni, M ;
Zollinger, A .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2003, 17 (02) :217-220
[9]  
LATSON TW, 1993, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V79, P1233
[10]   Comparison of continuous cardiac output measurements in patients after cardiac surgery [J].
Mielck, F ;
Buhre, W ;
Hanekop, G ;
Tirilomis, T ;
Hilgers, R ;
Sonntag, H .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2003, 17 (02) :211-216