Commitment and Dispatch With Uncertain Wind Generation by Dynamic Programming

被引:93
作者
Hargreaves, Jeremy J. [1 ]
Hobbs, Benjamin F. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Energy & Environm Econ, San Francisco, CA 94104 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Geog & Environm Engn, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Appl Math & Stat, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
关键词
Markov chains; Monte Carlo simulation; power market models; renewable energy integration; stochastic dynamic programming (SDP); UNIT COMMITMENT; POWER;
D O I
10.1109/TSTE.2012.2199526
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Fluctuating wind production over short time periods is balanced by adjusting generation from thermal plants to meet demand. Thermal ramp rates are limited, so increased variation in wind output as wind penetration increases can add to system operating costs because of the need for more thermal operating reserves. Traditional deterministic modeling techniques fail to fully capture these extra costs. We propose a stochastic dynamic programming (SDP) approach to unit commitment and dispatch, minimizing operating costs by making optimal unit commitment, dispatch, and storage decisions in the face of uncertain wind generation. The SDP solution is compared with two other solutions: 1) that of a deterministic dynamic program with perfect wind predictions to find the cost of imperfect information, and 2) that of a simulation model run under a decision rule, derived from Monte Carlo simulations of the deterministic model, to assess the cost of suboptimal stochastic decision making. An example Netherlands application shows that these costs can amount to several percent of total production costs, depending on installed wind capacity. These are the conclusions of a single simplified case study. Nonetheless, the results indicate that efforts to improve wind forecasting and to develop stochastic commitment models may be highly beneficial.
引用
收藏
页码:724 / 734
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], W WIND SOL INT STUD
[2]  
[Anonymous], E WIND INT TRANSM ST
[3]  
Bellman R. E., 1957, Dynamic programming. Princeton landmarks in mathematics
[4]   A new approach to quantify reserve demand in systems with significant installed wind capacity [J].
Doherty, R ;
O'Malley, M .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2005, 20 (02) :587-595
[5]  
Ela E., 2009, P POW EN SOC GEN M C
[6]  
Hobbs B.F., 2001, NEXT GENERATION ELEC
[7]   OPTIMIZATION METHODS FOR ELECTRIC UTILITY RESOURCE PLANNING [J].
HOBBS, BF .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1995, 83 (01) :1-20
[8]  
Holttinen H., 2008, P WINDP 2008 HOUST T
[9]  
Holttinen H, 2009, P 8 INT WORKSH LARG
[10]   Dynamic Constraints for Aggregated Units: Formulation and Application [J].
Langrene, Nicolas ;
van Ackooij, Wim ;
Breant, Frederic .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2011, 26 (03) :1349-1356