Effectiveness of Extension-Controlled Lumbar Support and Elastic Lumbar Support in Chronic Low Back Pain in Short-Term Follow-Up and the Factors Affecting the Compliance: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study

被引:1
作者
Ay Uslusoy, Gokcen [1 ]
Savas, Serpil [1 ]
机构
[1] Suleyman Demirel Univ, Tip Fak, Fiz Tip & Rehabil Anabilim Dali, TR-32200 Isparta, Turkey
来源
TURKIYE FIZIKSEL TIP VE REHABILITASYON DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2013年 / 59卷 / 03期
关键词
Low back pain; chronic; therapy; lumbar support; efficiency; HOME-CARE WORKERS; LUMBOSACRAL ORTHOSES; PROPRIOCEPTION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.4274/tftr.43925
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: It still remains unclear if lumbar supports are effective in the treatment of chronic low back pain. The objective of the present study was to assess and compare the short-term effect of extension-controlled lumbar support and elastic lumbar support on low back pain, lumbar flexibility and back-specific disability in chronic low back pain patients. We also investigated the factors affecting the lumbar support compliance. Materials and Methods: One hundred and eighteen chronic low back pain patients were randomly allocated into three groups. Group 1 (n=39) was prescribed traditional, extension-controlled lumbar support; group 2 (n=40) was prescribed elastic lumbar support; both for six hours a day for three weeks. Lumbar support was not prescribed for group 3 (n=39). All patients used 1000 mg/day naproxen sodium. Pain severity was evaluated with numeric rating scale (NRS), back flexibility was evaluated with the Schober test and back-specific disability was evaluated with the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). A 30% improvement was considered as threshold for identifying clinically meaningful improvement on NRS and RMDQ. Results: Clinically meaningful improvement was detected on NRS (45%) and RMDQ (35%) in group 1; on NRS (37%) in group 2. No meaningful clinical improvement was detected in group 3 on NRS and RMDQ. Lumbar support compliance was 52.1% in groups 1 and 2. Compliancewas positively correlated with patients' pre-treatment positive beliefs about the lumbar support and negatively side effects of lumbar support. Conclusion: In chronic low back pain patients, extension-controlled lumbar support or elastic lumbar support usage in addition to classical medical treatment is better than classical medical treatment alone in terms of pain intensity in short term. Extension-controlled lumbar support improves back-specific disability. Compliance with the lumbar support was increased with the patients' pre-treatment positive beliefs about lumbar support and decreased with the side effects of lumbar support.
引用
收藏
页码:182 / 188
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Alastair Gibson J, 2002, Journal of Orthopaedic Medicine, V24, P86
[2]   Effectiveness of a Lumbar Belt in Subacute Low Back Pain An Open, Multicentric, and Randomized Clinical Study [J].
Calmels, Paul ;
Queneau, Patrice ;
Hamonet, Claude ;
Le Pen, Claude ;
Maurel, Frederique ;
Lerouvreur, Claire ;
Thoumie, Philippe .
SPINE, 2009, 34 (03) :215-220
[3]   The effects of a 3-week use of lumbosacral orthoses on proprioception in the lumbar spine [J].
Cholewicki, J ;
Shah, KR ;
McGill, KC .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2006, 36 (04) :225-231
[4]   Lumbosacral orthoses reduce trunk muscle activity in a postural control task [J].
Cholewicki, Jacek ;
Reeves, N. Peter ;
Everding, Vanessa Q. ;
Morrisette, David C. .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2007, 40 (08) :1731-1736
[5]  
COXHEAD CE, 1981, LANCET, V1, P1065
[6]   Influence of elastic lumbar belts on the effect of a muscle strengthening program for patients with low back pain. [J].
Dalichau, S ;
Scheele, K .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND IHRE GRENZGEBIETE, 2000, 138 (01) :8-16
[7]   MANIPULATION IN TREATMENT OF LOW-BACK PAIN - MULTICENTER STUDY [J].
DORAN, DML ;
NEWELL, DJ .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1975, 2 (5964) :161-164
[8]   A reliable and accurate method for measuring orthosis wearing time [J].
Havey, R ;
Gavin, T ;
Patwardhan, A ;
Pawelczak, S ;
Ibrahim, K ;
Andersson, GBJ ;
Lavender, S .
SPINE, 2002, 27 (02) :211-214
[9]  
Hisli N., 1989, Turk Psikoloji Dergisi, V6, P3
[10]  
HSIEH CYJ, 1992, J MANIP PHYSIOL THER, V15, P4