Stated preferences for smart green infrastructure in stormwater management

被引:30
作者
Meng, Ting [1 ]
Hsu, David [2 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Dept Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] MIT, Dept Urban Studies & Planning, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Green infrastructure; Smart infrastructure; Stormwater management; Choice modeling; Stated preference; Stormwater agencies; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; WATER-QUALITY; URBAN WATER; BENEFITS; IMPACTS; IMPROVEMENTS; ADAPTATION; SERVICE; CHOICE; COSTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.03.002
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Many smart technologies have been proposed to improve existing or new infrastructures by adding sensing, controls, communications and computing, but it is not well understood which actual functions and capabilities are desired by potential users. Since water systems in the United States are largely run by public sector agencies, this study conducted a national survey with officials in water utilities and agencies to understand what kinds and capabilities of smart green infrastructure are desired for stormwater management. Analyzing the stated preferences of these users using a discrete choice model, our results indicate that these officials are willing to invest more upfront in smart technologies if they lower the costs associated over time with construction, maintenance, and labor. For example, in a typical rain garden, water agencies are willing to pay 12.1% more for construction to reduce maintenance costs by 20% and would pay 12.9% more to add self-irrigating capabilities. Preferences for smart green infrastructure among agencies are also affected by their characteristics. Agencies with large service areas or prior experience with green infrastructure are more likely to adopt smart green infrastructure. These results should assist in the further design and development of smart technologies and green infrastructure in stormwater management.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [1] Effectiveness of Low Impact Development Practices: Literature Review and Suggestions for Future Research
    Ahiablame, Laurent M.
    Engel, Bernard A.
    Chaubey, Indrajeet
    [J]. WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2012, 223 (07) : 4253 - 4273
  • [2] [Anonymous], WHAT IS GREEN INFR
  • [3] Impervious surface coverage - The emergence of a key environmental indicator
    Arnold, CL
    Gibbons, CJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 1996, 62 (02) : 243 - 258
  • [4] Key issues for sustainable urban stormwater management
    Barbosa, A. E.
    Fernandes, J. N.
    David, L. M.
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2012, 46 (20) : 6787 - 6798
  • [5] Cross-sectoral optimization and visualization of transformation processes in urban water infrastructures in rural areas
    Baron, S.
    Alves, I. Kaufmann
    Schmitt, T. G.
    Schoeffel, S.
    Schwank, J.
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 72 (10) : 1730 - 1738
  • [6] Big Data Analytics for a Smart Green Infrastructure Strategy
    Barrile, Vincenzo
    Bonfa, Stefano
    Bilotta, Giuliana
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATERIALS, ALLOYS AND EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS (ICMAEM-2017), 2017, 225
  • [7] The intention-behaviour gap in technology usage: the moderating role of attitude strength
    Bhattacherjee, A.
    Sanford, C.
    [J]. BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 28 (04) : 389 - 401
  • [8] Measuring willingness to pay to improve municipal water in southeast Anatolia, Turkey
    Bilgic, Abdulbaki
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2010, 46
  • [9] Black & Veatch, 2014, STORMW UT SURV 2014
  • [10] Complexity in choice experiments: choice of the status quo alternative and implications for welfare measurement
    Boxall, Peter
    Adamowicz, W. L.
    Moon, Amanda
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2009, 53 (04) : 503 - 519