Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone grafting and cemented polyethylene socket in total hip revision arthroplasty

被引:14
作者
Kostensalo, I. [1 ]
Seppanen, M. [1 ]
Virolainen, P. [1 ]
Mokka, J. [1 ]
Koivisto, M. [2 ]
Makela, K. T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Turku Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Turku 20700, Finland
[2] Univ Turku, Dept Biostat, Turku, Finland
关键词
Impaction bone grafting; revision hip arthroplasty; acetabular reconstruction; FOLLOW-UP; DEFECT CLASSIFICATION; RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS; CUP; ALLOGRAFTS; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1177/1457496914568408
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and aims: Bone deficiency in revision total hip arthroplasty is a challenge to the surgeon. One option for restoration of the bone stock is impaction bone grafting and use of a cemented socket. The aim of this study was to evaluate the mid-term clinical outcome of impaction bone grafting and cemented socket revisions. Material and methods: A total of 59 patients (60 hips) underwent revision arthroplasty with impaction bone grafting and application of a cemented socket on the acetabular side in the Turku University Hospital from 1999 to 2004. The study end-point was re-revision for any reason. The cumulative percentages for survival were followed and estimated with Kaplan-Meier curves. Associations between occurrence of re-revision and potential risk factors were analyzed with logistic regression. Results were quantified by odd ratios and 95% confidence intervals. The mean age of the patients was 69years (33% male). A total of 3% of the patients had a class I Paprosky acetabular defect, 38% had class II, and 55% had class III. Results: The overall survival rate was 73%. The mean follow-up time was 7years. The most common reason for re-revision was aseptic loosening of the acetabular component (13 patients, 81% of re-revisions). Cox's regression analysis did not identify any risk factors for re-revision. Conclusion: Our results were inferior compared to some previous studies. Impaction bone grafting of acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty may not always provide a reliable bone stock in long-term.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 272
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[21]  
Schreurs BW, 2001, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P202
[22]  
SLOOFF TJ, 1993, ORTHOP CLIN N AM, V24, P667
[23]  
Slooff TJJH, 1996, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P108
[24]  
Tagil M, 2000, Acta Orthop Scand Suppl, V290, P1
[25]   Scintigraphic evaluation of impaction grafting for total hip arthroplasty revision [J].
Tokgözoglu, AM ;
Aydin, M ;
Atilla, B ;
Caner, B .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2000, 120 (7-8) :416-419
[26]   Impacted corticocancellous allografts - Recoil and strength [J].
Ullmark, G ;
Nilsson, O .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1999, 14 (08) :1019-1023
[27]   Revisions of Extensive Acetabular Defects with Impaction Grafting and a Cement Cup [J].
van Egmond, Nienke ;
De Kam, Daniel C. J. ;
Gardeniers, Jean W. M. ;
Schreurs, B. Willem .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2011, 469 (02) :562-573
[28]   High rate of failure of impaction grafting in large acetabular defects [J].
van Haaren, E. H. ;
Heyligers, I. C. ;
Alexander, F. G. M. ;
Wuisman, P. I. J. M. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2007, 89B (03) :296-300
[29]   Acetabular reconstruction with impacted morcellized cancellous bone autograft and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty - A 10-to 17-year follow-up study [J].
Welten, MLM ;
Schreurs, BW ;
Buma, P ;
Verdonschot, N ;
Slooff, TJJH .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2000, 15 (07) :819-824
[30]   Validity and Reliability of the Paprosky Acetabular Defect Classification [J].
Yu, Raymond ;
Hofstaetter, Jochen G. ;
Sullivan, Thomas ;
Costi, Kerry ;
Howie, Donald W. ;
Solomon, Lucian B. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2013, 471 (07) :2259-2265