Sustainable bioenergy production from marginal lands in the US Midwest

被引:553
|
作者
Gelfand, Ilya [1 ,2 ]
Sahajpal, Ritvik [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Xuesong [1 ,3 ]
Izaurralde, R. Cesar [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Gross, Katherine L. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Robertson, G. Philip [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Great Lakes Bioenergy Res Ctr, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, WK Kellogg Biol Stn, Hickory Corners, MI 49060 USA
[3] Pacific NW Natl Lab, Joint Global Change Res Inst, College Pk, MD 20740 USA
[4] Univ Maryland, Dept Geog Sci, College Pk, MD 20740 USA
[5] Michigan State Univ, Dept Plant Biol, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[6] Michigan State Univ, Dept Plant Soil & Microbial Sci, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; CLIMATE-CHANGE; PART II; BIOFUELS; ETHANOL; CORN; AGRICULTURE; GRASSLANDS; DIVERSITY; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1038/nature11811
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Legislation on biofuels production in the USA(1) and Europe(2,3) is directing food crops towards the production of grain-based ethanol(2,3), which can have detrimental consequences for soil carbon sequestration(4), nitrous oxide emissions(5), nitrate pollution(6), biodiversity(7) and human health(8). An alternative is to grow lignocellulosic (cellulosic) crops on 'marginal' lands(9). Cellulosic feedstocks can have positive environmental outcomes(10,11) and could make up a substantial proportion of future energy portfolios(12,13). However, the availability of marginal lands for cellulosic feedstock production, and the resulting greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, remains uncertain. Here we evaluate the potential for marginal lands in ten Midwestern US states to produce sizeable amounts of biomass and concurrently mitigate GHG emissions. In a comparative assessment of six alternative cropping systems over 20 years, we found that successional herbaceous vegetation, once well established, has a direct GHG emissions mitigation capacity that rivals that of purpose-grown crops (-851 +/- 46 grams of CO2 equivalent emissions per square metre per year (gCO(2)e m(-2) yr(-1))). If fertilized, these communities have the capacity to produce about 63 +/- 5 gigajoules of ethanol energy per hectare per year. By contrast, an adjacent, no-till corn-soybean-wheat rotation produces on average 41 +/- 1 gigajoules of biofuel energy per hectare per year and has a net direct mitigation capacity of -397 +/- 32 gCO(2)e m(-2) yr(-1); a continuous corn rotation would probably produce about 62 +/- 7 gigajoules of biofuel energy per hectare per year, with 13% less mitigation. We also perform quantitative modelling of successional vegetation on marginal lands in the region at a resolution of 0.4 hectares, constrained by the requirement that each modelled location be within 80 kilometres of a potential biorefinery. Our results suggest that such vegetation could produce about 21 gigalitres of ethanol per year from around 11 million hectares, or approximately 25 per cent of the 2022 target for cellulosic biofuel mandated by the US Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, with no initial carbon debt nor the indirect land-use costs associated with food-based biofuels. Other regional-scale aspects of biofuel sustainability(2), such as water quality(11,14) and biodiversity(15), await future study.
引用
收藏
页码:514 / +
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ongoing and emerging issues for sustainable bioenergy production on marginal lands in the Mediterranean regions
    Pulighe, Giuseppe
    Bonati, Guido
    Colangeli, Marco
    Morese, Maria Michela
    Traverso, Lorenzo
    Lupia, Flavio
    Khawaja, Cosette
    Janssen, Rainer
    Fava, Francesco
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 103 : 58 - 70
  • [2] Biomass production for bioenergy using marginal lands
    Mehmood, Muhammad Aamer
    Ibrahim, Muhammad
    Rashid, Umer
    Nawaz, Muhammad
    Ali, Shafaqat
    Hussain, Athar
    Gull, Munazza
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2017, 9 : 3 - 21
  • [3] Reporting on Marginal Lands for Bioenergy Feedstock Production: a Modest Proposal
    Brian K. Richards
    Cathelijne R. Stoof
    Ian J. Cary
    Peter B. Woodbury
    BioEnergy Research, 2014, 7 : 1060 - 1062
  • [4] Reporting on Marginal Lands for Bioenergy Feedstock Production: a Modest Proposal
    Richards, Brian K.
    Stoof, Cathelijne R.
    Cary, Ian J.
    Woodbury, Peter B.
    BIOENERGY RESEARCH, 2014, 7 (03) : 1060 - 1062
  • [5] Water and energy footprints of bioenergy crop production on marginal lands
    Bhardwaj, A. K.
    Zenone, T.
    Jasrotia, P.
    Robertson, G. P.
    Chen, J.
    Hamilton, S. K.
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2011, 3 (03): : 208 - 222
  • [6] Evapotranspiration of advanced perennial bioenergy grasses produced on marginal land in the US Midwest
    Zumpf, Colleen R.
    Cacho, Jules F.
    Grasse, Nora F.
    Walsh, Callie
    Lee, Daniel J.
    Lee, Dokyoung
    Negri, M. Cristina
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2023, 178
  • [7] Emergy-based sustainability analysis of bioenergy production from marginal and degraded lands of India
    Edrisi, Sheikh Adil
    Sahiba, Sheikh Arshiya
    Chen, Bin
    Abhilash, P. C.
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2022, 466
  • [8] Warm-Season Grass Monocultures and Mixtures for Sustainable Bioenergy Feedstock Production in the Midwest, USA
    Lee, Moon-Sub
    Mitchell, Rob
    Heaton, Emily
    Zumpf, Colleen
    Lee, D. K.
    BIOENERGY RESEARCH, 2019, 12 (01) : 43 - 54
  • [9] Identifying non-agricultural marginal lands as a route to sustainable bioenergy provision - A review and holistic definition
    Mellor, P.
    Lord, R. A.
    Joao, E.
    Thomas, R.
    Hursthouse, A.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 135 (135)
  • [10] Why large-scale bioenergy production on marginal land is unfeasible: A conceptual partial equilibrium analysis
    Bryngelsson, David K.
    Lindgren, Kristian
    ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 55 : 454 - 466