Effects of Change Interventions: What Kind of Evidence Do We Really Have?

被引:24
作者
Barends, Eric [1 ]
Janssen, Barbara [1 ]
ten Have, Wouter [1 ]
ten Have, Steven [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
organizational change; evidence; research design; replication; validity; systematic review; BIAS; REPLICATION; MANAGEMENT; SCIENCE; ORGANIZATION; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1177/0021886312473152
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Despite the popularity of organizational change management, the question arises whether its prescriptions are based on solid and convergent evidence. To answer this question, a systematic review was conducted of organizational change management research published in scholarly journals during the past 30 years. The databases ABI/INFORM, Business Source Premier, ERIC, and PsycINFO were searched for relevant studies. A total of 563 studies met the review's criteria. Assessment shows a predominance of one-shot studies with a low internal validity. Replication studies are rare. Findings suggest that scholars and practitioners should be sceptical regarding the body of research results in the field of organizational change management published to date. Prescriptions are offered for researchers, editors, and educators to develop a more solid body of evidence on organizational change management.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 27
页数:23
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions
    Abraham, Charles
    Michie, Susan
    [J]. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 27 (03) : 379 - 387
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2007, The Research Methods Knowledge Base
  • [3] [Anonymous], AM BEHAV SCI
  • [4] [Anonymous], METHODEN PUBLIZISTIK
  • [5] [Anonymous], J BUSINESS RES
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2012, INTRO SYSTEMATIC REV
  • [7] [Anonymous], RES METHODS PSYCHOL
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2001, LEVELS EVIDENCE
  • [9] [Anonymous], MODERD EPIDEMIOLOGY
  • [10] [Anonymous], 1995, Observational Studies