In-house windrowing of a commercial broiler farm during early spring and its effect on litter composition

被引:10
作者
Barker, K. J. [1 ]
Coufal, C. D. [2 ]
Purswell, J. L. [3 ]
Davis, J. D. [4 ]
Parker, H. M. [1 ]
Kidd, M. T. [5 ]
McDaniel, C. D. [1 ]
Kiess, A. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Poultry Sci, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Poultry Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] USDA Agr Res Serv, Poultry Res Unit, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
[4] Mississippi State Univ, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
[5] Univ Arkansas, Dept Poultry Sci, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
关键词
broiler; windrowing; ammonia; temperature; microbe; POULTRY LITTER; PATHOGENS; AMMONIA; CHAMBER; FLUX;
D O I
10.3382/japr.2013-00744
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The use of in-house windrowing of broiler litter between flocks has been used as a litter management procedure to reduce pathogen content and improve the quality of the house environment for newly placed chicks. A trial was conducted to determine what effects different methods of in-house windrowing would have on litter composition during the early spring months of March and April. Using 2 commercial broiler houses, 3 in-house windrowing treatments were applied to built-up litter from multiple flock grow-out cycles and compared with traditional decaked, nonwindrowed litter management. Each windrowing treatment consisted of a 6-d windrow, composed of either decaked litter, caked litter incorporated into windrows, or decaked litter covered with a nonbreathable tarp. Each commercial broiler house was divided into sixteen 6.1 x 6.1-m plots with each treatment being replicated using 4 plots per house. Litter samples from each treatment plot were collected and analyzed for percent moisture, pH, and bacteria levels on d 0, 7, and 14 of the trial. Broiler chicks were placed in each house on d 7. Ammonia volatilization was assessed from each plot on d 7 and 14. Litter moisture decreased over time for all treatments and was not significantly different between treatments. Litter pH in all treatments decreased from d 7 to 14 with no differences between d 0 and 7. Temperatures for the decaked and cake-in treatments exceeded the temperature (50 degrees C) necessary to eliminate pathogenic bacteria, but the control and covered treatments did not. Ammonia volatilization was significantly less on d 14 compared with d 7, but was not different among the treatments. Aerobic, anaerobic, and coliform litter counts decreased from d 0 to 7 with no difference between d 7 and 14 and no treatment effect. In conclusion, no differences were found between the decaked control and windrowing treatments during the spring layout period studied.
引用
收藏
页码:551 / 558
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2007, ASABE Standards, V54th, P596
[2]   In-house windrowing of a commercial broiler farm during the summer months and its effect on litter composition [J].
Barker, K. J. ;
Coufal, C. D. ;
Purswell, J. L. ;
Davis, J. D. ;
Parker, H. M. ;
Kidd, M. T. ;
McDaniel, C. D. ;
Kiess, A. S. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED POULTRY RESEARCH, 2011, 20 (02) :168-180
[3]  
Brewer SK, 1999, T ASAE, V42, P1415, DOI 10.13031/2013.13305
[4]   Pathogen reduction in sewage sludge by composting and other biological treatments: A review [J].
Dumontet, S ;
Dinel, H ;
Baloda, SB .
BIOLOGICAL AGRICULTURE & HORTICULTURE, 1999, 16 (04) :409-430
[5]  
Gates R. S., 1997, ASAE ANN INT M
[6]  
Lavergne T. K., 2006, LOUISIANA STATE U AG, V2955
[7]   In-House Windrow Composting and Its Effects on Foodborne Pathogens [J].
Macklin, K. S. ;
Hess, J. B. ;
Bilgili, S. F. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED POULTRY RESEARCH, 2008, 17 (01) :121-127
[8]   Effects of in-house composting of litter on bacterial levels [J].
Macklin, K. S. ;
Hess, J. B. ;
Bilgili, S. F. ;
Norton, R. A. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED POULTRY RESEARCH, 2006, 15 (04) :531-537
[9]  
Malone B., 2008, Proc Virginia Poultry Health Seminar, P32
[10]   Spatial variability of litter gaseous flux within a commercial broiler house: Ammonia, nitrous oxide, carbon dioxide, and methane [J].
Miles, DM ;
Owens, PR ;
Rowe, DE .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 2006, 85 (02) :167-172