MRI in the evaluation of breast cancer patient response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: predictive factors for breast conservative surgery

被引:16
作者
Nadrljanski, Mirjan M. [1 ]
Milosevic, Zorica C. [1 ,4 ]
Plesinac-Karapandzic, Vesna [2 ,4 ]
Maksimovic, Ruzica [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Inst Oncol & Radiol Serbia, Dept Diagnost Imaging, Belgrade, Serbia
[2] Inst Oncol & Radiol Serbia, Dept Radiat Oncol, Clin Radiat Oncol & Radiol, Belgrade, Serbia
[3] Clin Ctr Serbia, Ctr Radiol & Magnet Resonance Imaging, Belgrade, Serbia
[4] Univ Belgrade, Fac Med, Belgrade, Serbia
关键词
CONSERVING SURGERY; RECIST GUIDELINE; LOCAL RECURRENCE; SOLID TUMORS; ACCURACY; THERAPY; RATES;
D O I
10.5152/dir.2013.13201
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE We aimed to prospectively assess the role of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in the evaluation of predictive factors for breast conservative surgery during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Sixty-six patients were evaluated before the first treatment cycle, after the second cycle, and upon the completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to largest tumor diameter, tumor volume, postcontrast enhancement, and tumor regression pattern. The patients were divided into responders (pathologic complete and near complete response) and nonresponders. Each subgroup was re-evaluated according to morphokinetic criteria for identification of candidates for breast conservative surgery. RESULTS In responders (n=27), the lesion size upon the completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was significantly smaller compared to nonresponders (1.5 +/- 0.6 vs. 3.2 +/- 0.9 cm; P<0.001), as was the volume (1.2 vs. 11.0 cm(3); P<0.001). The measured lesion size did not differ from the histologic size (1.5 0.6 vs. 1.2 +/- 0.6 cm; P=0.09) and had a high correlation (r=0.93). In responders, the following parameters were significantly different before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: size (3.6 +/- 1.4 to 1.5 +/- 0.6 cm; P<0.001), volume (17.6 to 1.2 cm(3); P <0.001), predominant concentric regression, plateau and continuous time-intensity curves (P<0.001). DCE-MRI has the sensitivity of 87% and the accuracy of 77% to identify candidates for breast conservative surgery CONCLUSION Selected morphokinetic DCE-MRI parameters may contribute to the multidisciplinary decision when considering the selection of candidates for breast conservative surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 470
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction [J].
Al-Ghazal, SK ;
Fallowfield, L ;
Blamey, RW .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2000, 36 (15) :1938-1943
[2]  
[Anonymous], NCCN CLIN PRACT GUID
[3]   Size of invasive breast cancer and risk of local recurrence after breast-conservation therapy [J].
Asgeirsson, KS ;
McCulley, SJ ;
Pinder, SE ;
Macmillan, RD .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 39 (17) :2462-2469
[4]   Breast Cancer Local Therapy: What Is Its Effect on Mortality? [J].
Benson, John R. ;
Teo, Katy A. T. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 36 (07) :1460-1474
[5]   Accuracy of physical examination, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging in predicting response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer [J].
Chen Man ;
Zhan Wei-wei ;
Han Bao-san ;
Fei Xiao-chun ;
Jin Xiao-long ;
Chai Wei-min ;
Wang Deng-bing ;
Shen Kun-wei ;
Wang Wen-ping .
CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 125 (11) :1862-1866
[6]  
Cristini Vittorio, 2008, P113, DOI 10.1007/978-0-8176-4713-1_6
[7]   Assessment of therapeutic response of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) monitored using sequential magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) [J].
Danishad, Karikanni Kalathil A. ;
Sharma, Uma ;
Sah, Rani G. ;
Seenu, Vurthaluru ;
Parshad, Rajinder ;
Jagannathan, Naranamangalam R. .
NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2010, 23 (03) :233-241
[8]   The role of breast MRI in planning the surgical treatment of breast cancer [J].
Duygulu, Gokhan ;
Oktay, Aysenur ;
Bilgen, Isil Gunhan ;
Kapkac, Murat ;
Zekioglu, Osman .
DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 18 (05) :460-467
[9]  
Edge S.B., 2010, AJCC cancer staging manual, V649
[10]   New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) [J].
Eisenhauer, E. A. ;
Therasse, P. ;
Bogaerts, J. ;
Schwartz, L. H. ;
Sargent, D. ;
Ford, R. ;
Dancey, J. ;
Arbuck, S. ;
Gwyther, S. ;
Mooney, M. ;
Rubinstein, L. ;
Shankar, L. ;
Dodd, L. ;
Kaplan, R. ;
Lacombe, D. ;
Verweij, J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (02) :228-247