Cyclic behavior of double-skin composite walls with flat and corrugated faceplates

被引:42
作者
Zhao, Qiuhong [1 ,2 ]
Li, Yikang [1 ]
Tian, Ying [3 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Tianjin 300350, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Coast Civil Struct Safety, Tianjin 300350, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Nevada, Dept Civil & Environm Engn & Construct, Las Vegas, NV 89154 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Double-skin composite wall; Corrugated faceplate; Seismic performance; Cyclic loading; Bolt spacing; Flexural strength; Drift capacity; SEISMIC BEHAVIOR; SHEAR CONNECTORS; PERFORMANCE; DESIGN; STRENGTH; PANELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111013
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper presents the cyclic behavior of double-skin composite (DSC) walls for mid-to high-rise buildings, which consist of concrete filled steel tubes (CFTs), a pair of steel faceplates connected by tie bolts, and infill concrete. Four 1/3-scale DSC wall specimens, varying in faceplate profile and tie bolt spacing, were tested under combined axial and cyclic lateral loading. All specimens failed in flexure with a progression of steel tube frac-ture, steel faceplate buckling, and concrete crushing at wall bottom. The corrugated DSC walls and the flat DSC wall with standard bolt spacing were able to achieve an ultimate drift ratio around 3.4% and a ductility ratio greater than 5.4, while the flat DSC wall with bolt spacing 50% over code limit presented early faceplate buckling and undesired seismic performance. Compared to flat DSC walls, corrugated DSC walls, even with a doubled tie bolt spacing, had considerably higher initial stiffness, ductility ratio and energy dissipation. Formulations are proposed for predicting the lateral strength and drift capacity of corrugated DSC walls without elastic local buckling. The difference between the predicted and measured capacity for either lateral strength or drift is on average less than 6%.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], THESIS
[2]  
Bhardwaj SR, 2016, P ANN STAB C 2016 OR
[3]  
Bruneau M, 2019, CPF0517 U BUFF
[4]  
[卜凡民 Bu Fanmin], 2013, [建筑结构学报, Journal of Building Structures], V34, P91
[5]  
China Ministry of Construction, 2010, 500102010 GB CHIN MI
[6]  
China Ministry of Construction, 2015, 1012015 JGJT
[7]  
China Ministry of Construction, 2015, 3802015 JGJT
[8]  
China Ministry of Construction, 2014, GB509362014 GB CHIN
[9]   Shear strength of steel-concrete-steel composite panels. Part I - testing and numerical modelling [J].
Clubley, SK ;
Moy, SSJ ;
Xiao, RY .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2003, 59 (06) :781-794
[10]  
Hines EM, 1999, SSRP9915UN U CAL