How scientific reasoning correlates with health-related beliefs and behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic?

被引：79

作者：

Cavojova, Vladimira ^{[1
]}

Srol, Jakub ^{[1
]}

Ballova Mikuskova, Eva ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Slovak Acad Sci, Inst Expt Psychol, Ctr Social & Psychol Sci, Dubravska Cesta 9, Bratislava 84104, Slovakia

来源：

JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY | 2022年 / 27卷 / 03期

关键词：

analytic thinking; anti-vaccination attitudes; COVID-19; COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs; preventive behavior; scientific reasoning; COGNITIVE REFLECTION; CONSPIRACY THEORIES; MYSIDE BIAS; UNIVERSITY; LITERACY; SCIENCE; POINT; GAP;

D O I：

10.1177/1359105320962266

中图分类号：

B849 [应用心理学];

学科分类号：

040203 ;

摘要：

We examined whether scientific reasoning is associated with health-related beliefs and behaviors over and above general analytic thinking ability in the general public (N = 783, aged 18-84). Health-related beliefs included: anti-vaccination attitudes, COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs, and generic health-related epistemically suspect beliefs. Scientific reasoning correlated with generic pseudoscientific and health-related conspiracy beliefs and COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs. Crucially, scientific reasoning was a stronger independent predictor of unfounded beliefs (including anti-vaccination attitudes) than general analytic thinking was; however, it had a more modest role in health-related behaviors.

引用

页码：534 / 547

页数：14

共 48 条

[1]

Banakova J, SCI ED

[2] Belief incongruence and the intention-behavior gap in persons with at-risk alcohol use [J].

Baumann, Sophie ;

Gaertner, Beate ;

Schnuerer, Inga ;

Haberecht, Katja ;

John, Ulrich ;

Freyer-Adam, Jennis .

ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2015, 48 :5-11

[3]

Bostrom H, 1990, Qual Assur Health Care, V2, P111

[4] The role of scientific reasoning and religious beliefs in use of complementary and alternative medicine [J].

Cavojova, Vladimira ;

Ersoy, Selin .

JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 42 (03) :E239-E248

[5] Why should we try to think like scientists? Scientific reasoning and susceptibility to epistemically suspect beliefs and cognitive biases [J].

Cavojova, Vladimira ;

Srol, Jakub ;

Jurkovic, Marek .

APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 34 (01) :85-95

[6] My point is valid, yours is not: myside bias in reasoning about abortion [J].

Cavojova, Vladimira ;

Srol, Jakub ;

Adamus, Magdalena .

JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 30 (07) :656-669

[7] Why do scientists disagree? Explaining and improving measures of the perceived causes of scientific disputes [J].

Dieckmann, Nathan F. ;

Johnson, Branden B. .

PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (02)

[8] Does "putting on your thinking cap" reduce myside bias in evaluation of scientific evidence? [J].

Drummond, Caitlin ;

Fischhoff, Baruch .

THINKING & REASONING, 2019, 25 (04) :477-505

[9] Individuals with greater science literacy and education have more polarized beliefs on controversial science topics [J].

Drummond, Caitlin ;

Fischhoff, Baruch .

PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2017, 114 (36) :9587-9592

[10] Development and Validation of the Scientific Reasoning Scale [J].

Drummond, Caitlin ;

Fischhoff, Baruch .

JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2017, 30 (01) :26-38

← 1 2 3 4 5 →