Future Colorado River Basin Drought and Surplus

被引:4
作者
Bedri, Rama [1 ]
Piechota, Thomas [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chapman Univ, Schmid Coll Sci & Technol, Orange, CA 92866 USA
[2] Chapman Univ, Fowler Sch Engn, Orange, CA 92866 USA
关键词
drought; climate change; water; hydrology; streamflow; CLIMATE-CHANGE; WATER;
D O I
10.3390/hydrology9120227
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Historical and future drought and surplus periods in the Colorado River basin are evaluated based on eight climate scenarios. Unimpaired streamflow from 17 stations in the Colorado River are evaluated based on U.S. Geological Survey, Bureau of Reclamation, and Coupled Modeled Intercomparison Projection 5 downscaled data from 1950-2099. Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 4.5 and 8.5 emission scenarios are considered for four climate models (HadGEM2-ES, CNRM-CM5, CanESM2, MI-ROC5). Drought (surplus) quantities, magnitudes, severities, and water year flows are compared for the historical and future periods. Results indicate that there is a significant difference between the historical record and future projections. The results are not consistent in terms of increase of drought or surplus; however, the intensity (as measured by magnitude and duration) will likely increase for both RCP 4.5 and 8.5. The CanESM2 and CNRM-CM5 models project wetter scenarios, and HadGEM2 and MI-ROC5 models project drier scenarios. For the critical Lees Ferry station, models indicate a chance of higher drought and surplus length and magnitude on the order of two times the historical period. In addition, basin wide flow at Lees Ferry had a shift in the future mean ensemble of approximately 3-10% for the water year. Future hydrologic changes will heighten the need for appropriate management and infrastructure options available to adapt to these changes.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Impacts, Risks, and Adaptation in the United States: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume, VII
[2]   Comparison of CMIP3 and CMIP5 projected hydrologic conditions over the Upper Colorado River Basin [J].
Ayers, Jessica ;
Ficklin, Darren L. ;
Stewart, Iris T. ;
Strunk, Meredith .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2016, 36 (11) :3807-3818
[3]  
Bureau of Reclamation, 2014, DOWNSCALED CMIP3 CMI
[4]  
Bureau of Reclamation Interior Department Announces, INT DEP ANN ACT PROT
[5]  
Bureau of Reclamation West-Wide Climate and Hydrology Assessment, 2021, TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
[6]   The effects of climate change on the hydrology and water resources of the Colorado River basin [J].
Christensen, NS ;
Wood, AW ;
Voisin, N ;
Lettenmaier, DP ;
Palmer, RN .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2004, 62 (1-3) :337-363
[7]  
Dettinger M, 2015, ECOL APPL, V25, P2069, DOI 10.1890/15-0938.1
[8]   Causes for the Century-Long Decline in Colorado River Flow [J].
Hoerling, M. ;
Barsugli, J. ;
Livneh, B. ;
Eischeid, J. ;
Quan, X. ;
Badger, A. .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2019, 32 (23) :8181-8203
[9]  
Lukas J., 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE COLOR
[10]   California Drought Outlooks Based on Climate Change Models' Effects on Water Availability [J].
Lynam, Lauren ;
Piechota, Thomas .
WATER, 2021, 13 (22)