Comparison of different trapping methods for surveillance of mosquito vectors of West Nile virus in Rhone Delta, France

被引:33
作者
L'Ambert, Gregory [1 ]
Ferre, Jean-Baptiste [1 ]
Schaffner, Francis [1 ]
Fontenille, Didier [2 ]
机构
[1] Entente Interdept Demousticat, F-34184 Montpellier, France
[2] Inst Rech Dev UMR MIVEGEC UM1 CNRS 5290 IRD 224, F-34394 Montpellier, France
关键词
Species composition; adult mosquito traps; southern France; West Nile virus; Culex pipiens; Culex modestus; POPULATION-DYNAMICS; FEEDING PATTERNS; CULEX-PIPIENS; DIPTERA; ABUNDANCE; CULICIDAE; TRAPS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1948-7134.2012.00227.x
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
Five trapping methods were compared for monitoring potential vectors of the West Nile virus in four areas in the Camargue Plain of France: carbon dioxide traps, bird-baited traps, gravid traps, resting boxes, and human landing catches. A total of 73,721 specimens, representing 14 species, was trapped in 2006. Results showed significant differences in species and abundance between the type of traps. Many more specimens were collected using CO2 traps than any other method, with an average of 212 specimens per night per trap (p<0.05). Culex pipiens was the most abundant species collected (36.8% of total with CO2 traps), followed by Aedes caspius (22.7%), Anopheles hyrcanus (18.3%), Culex modestus (18.3%), and Aedes detritus (3.2%). Bird-baited traps captured only eight specimens per night per trap on average, mainly Cx. pipiens (89.9%). The species collected and their abundance are influenced by the trap location, at ground or canopy level. Culex pipiens was twice as abundant in the canopy as on the ground, whereas it was the opposite for Ae. caspius, An. hyrcanus, and Ae. detritus. Culex modestus was equally abundant at both levels. Resting boxes and gravid traps were much less efficient, capturing around 0.3 specimens per night per trap. Results are discussed in relation to West Nile virus surveillance.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 275
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Prevalence of West Nile virus in tree canopy-inhabiting Culex pipiens and associated mosquitoes [J].
Anderson, JF ;
Andreadis, TG ;
Main, AJ ;
Kline, DL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2004, 71 (01) :112-119
[2]  
Balenghien T, 2006, J MED ENTOMOL, V43, P936, DOI 10.1603/0022-2585(2006)43[936:HBAHBA]2.0.CO
[3]  
2
[4]   Vector Competence of Some French Culex and Aedes Mosquitoes for West Nile Virus [J].
Balenghien, Thomas ;
Vazeille, Marie ;
Grandadam, Marc ;
Schaffner, Francis ;
Zeller, Herve ;
Reiter, Paul ;
Sabatier, Philippe ;
Fouque, Florence ;
Bicout, Dominique J. .
VECTOR-BORNE AND ZOONOTIC DISEASES, 2008, 8 (05) :589-595
[5]  
BELLAMY R. E., 1952, MOSQUITO NEWS, V12, P256
[6]  
BERTSCH ML, 1983, MOSQ NEWS, V43, P203
[7]  
Crans WJ, 1995, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 82ND ANNUAL MEETING OF THE NEW JERSEY MOSQUITO CONTROL ASSOCIATION, INC., P53
[8]  
Darbro JM, 2006, J MED ENTOMOL, V43, P83, DOI 10.1603/0022-2585(2006)043[0083:BTFSOW]2.0.CO
[9]  
2
[10]  
Deegan CS, 2005, J MED ENTOMOL, V42, P1039, DOI 10.1603/0022-2585(2005)042[1039:SPSFWN]2.0.CO