Incidental genetic findings in randomized clinical trials: recommendations from the Genomics and Randomized Trials Network (GARNET)

被引:10
作者
Bookman, Ebony B. [1 ]
Din-Lovinescu, Corina [2 ]
Worrall, Bradford B. [3 ]
Manolio, Teri A. [1 ]
Bennett, Siiri N. [4 ]
Laurie, Cathy [4 ]
Mirel, Daniel B. [5 ]
Doheny, Kimberly F. [6 ]
Anderson, Garnet L. [7 ]
Wehr, Kate [4 ]
Weinshilboum, Richard [8 ]
Chen, Donna T. [9 ]
机构
[1] NHGRI, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Touro Coll Osteopath Med, New York, NY 10027 USA
[3] Univ Virginia, Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] 7 Cambridge Ctr, Broad Inst, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
[6] Johns Hopkins Univ, Ctr Inherited Dis Res, Baltimore, MD 21224 USA
[7] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
[8] Mayo Clin, Mayo Med Sch, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[9] Univ Virginia, Sch Med, Ctr Biomed Eth & Humanities, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
来源
GENOME MEDICINE | 2013年 / 5卷
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
WIDE ASSOCIATION; PARTICIPANTS;
D O I
10.1186/gm411
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Recommendations and guidance on how to handle the return of genetic results to patients have offered limited insight into how to approach incidental genetic findings in the context of clinical trials. This paper provides the Genomics and Randomized Trials Network (GARNET) recommendations on incidental genetic findings in the context of clinical trials, and discusses the ethical and practical issues considered in formulating our recommendations. There are arguments in support of as well as against returning incidental genetic findings in clinical trials. For instance, reporting incidental findings in clinical trials may improve the investigator-participant relationship and the satisfaction of participation, but it may also blur the line between clinical care and research. The issues of whether and how to return incidental genetic findings, including the costs of doing so, should be considered when developing clinical trial protocols. Once decided, plans related to sharing individual results from the aim(s) of the trial, as well as incidental findings, should be discussed explicitly in the consent form. Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) and other study-specific governing bodies should be part of the decision as to if, when, and how to return incidental findings, including when plans in this regard are being reconsidered.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Is it ethical to deny genetic research participants individualised results?
    Affleck, P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2009, 35 (04) : 209 - 213
  • [2] Medical researchers' ancillary clinical care responsibilities
    Belsky, L
    Richardson, HS
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7454): : 1494 - 1496
  • [3] Offering Individual Genetic Research Results: Context Matters
    Beskow, Laura M.
    Burke, Wylie
    [J]. SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2010, 2 (38)
  • [4] Reporting genetic results in research studies: Summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group
    Bookman, EB
    Langehorne, AA
    Eckfeldt, JH
    Glass, KC
    Jarvik, GP
    Klag, M
    Koski, G
    Motulsky, A
    Wilfond, B
    Manolio, TA
    Fabsitz, RR
    Luepker, RV
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A, 2006, 140A (10) : 1033 - 1040
  • [5] Disclosure of individual genetic data to research participants: the debate reconsidered
    Bredenoord, Annelien L.
    Kroes, Hester Y.
    Cuppen, Edwin
    Parker, Michael
    van Delden, Johannes J. M.
    [J]. TRENDS IN GENETICS, 2011, 27 (02) : 41 - 47
  • [6] Genetic test evaluation: Information needs of clinicians, policy makers, and the public
    Burke, W
    Atkins, D
    Gwinn, M
    Guttmacher, A
    Haddow, J
    Lau, J
    Palomaki, G
    Press, N
    Richards, CS
    Wideroff, L
    Wiesner, GL
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 156 (04) : 311 - 318
  • [7] Adaptive design methods in clinical trials - a review
    Chow, Shein-Chung
    Chang, Mark
    [J]. ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES, 2008, 3 (1)
  • [8] The Gene, Environment Association Studies Consortium (GENEVA): Maximizing the Knowledge Obtained from GWAS by Collaboration Across Studies of Multiple Conditions
    Cornelis, Marilyn C.
    Agrawal, Arpana
    Cole, John W.
    Hansel, Nadia N.
    Barnes, Kathleen C.
    Beaty, Terri H.
    Bennett, Siiri N.
    Bierut, Laura J.
    Boerwinkle, Eric
    Doheny, Kimberly F.
    Feenstra, Bjarke
    Feingold, Eleanor
    Fornage, Myriam
    Haiman, Christopher A.
    Harris, Emily L.
    Hayes, M. Geoffrey
    Heit, John A.
    Hu, Frank B.
    Kang, Jae H.
    Laurie, Cathy C.
    Ling, Hua
    Manolio, Teri A.
    Marazita, Mary L.
    Mathias, Rasika A.
    Mirel, Daniel B.
    Paschall, Justin
    Pasquale, Louis R.
    Pugh, Elizabeth W.
    Rice, John P.
    Udren, Jenna
    van Dam, Rob M.
    Wang, Xiaojing
    Wiggs, Janey L.
    Williams, Kayleen
    Yu, Kai
    [J]. GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 34 (04) : 364 - 372
  • [9] Communicating their individual results to participants in an environmental exposure study: Insights from clinical ethics
    Deck, W
    Kosatsky, T
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 1999, 80 (02) : S223 - S229
  • [10] Devine AS, 2010, WEST J EMERG MED, V11, P24