A comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopy and conventional laparotomy for the surgical evaluation of pelvic masses

被引:9
作者
Spannuth, WA [1 ]
Rocconi, RP [1 ]
Huh, WK [1 ]
Straughn, JM [1 ]
Barnes, MN [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
关键词
pelvic mass; hand-assisted laparoscopy; exploratory laparotomy; gynecologic surgery;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.06.049
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. Although hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) has been utilized in abdominal surgery, limited data exist on the feasibility and safety of HALS in the evaluation of pelvic masses. Our goal was to compare HALS to conventional laparotomy for pelvic masses in gynecologic patients. Methods. A chart review identified patients who underwent a HALS or XLAP procedure for the evaluation of a pelvic mass from January 2003 to September 2004. Results. 70 patients were analyzed-29 cases (FIALS) and 41 controls (XLAP). The groups were comparable in terms of age (48 vs. 49 years), body mass index (29.1 vs. 29.8 m(2)), and mass size (11.0 vs. 11.3 cm). Operative times were similar between the groups (90 vs. 72 min, P = 0.9). HALS was associated with decreased estimated blood loss (108 vs. 207 cm(3), P = 0.004), shorter hospital stay (2.8 vs. 4.2 days, P = 0.03), and fewer post-operative complications (4 vs. 11, P = 0.05). Conclusions. FIALS is a safe and feasible alternative to conventional open laparotomy for the evaluation and surgical treatment of pelvic masses. In addition to similar operative times, HALS demonstrated a decreased estimated blood loss, complication rate, and length of hospital stay. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 446
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
BEMELMAN W, 1995, SURG ENDOSC, V14, P997
[2]   Predictors of clinical outcomes in the laparoscopic management of adnexal masses [J].
Havrilesky, LJ ;
Peterson, BL ;
Dryden, DK ;
Soper, JT ;
Clarke-Pearson, DL ;
Berchuck, A .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 102 (02) :243-251
[3]  
HOSEMANN S, 2003, ONCOLOGIA, V48, P11
[4]   The utility of hand-assisted laparoscopy in ovarian cancer [J].
Krivak, TC ;
Elkas, JC ;
Rose, GS ;
Sundborg, M ;
Winter, WE ;
Carlson, J ;
MacKoul, PJ .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2005, 96 (01) :72-76
[5]  
KUSMINSKY RE, 1995, SURG LAPAROSC ENDOSC, V5, P463
[6]   Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) with the HandPort System - Initial experience with 68 patients [J].
Litwin, DEM ;
Darzi, A ;
Jakimowicz, J ;
Kelly, JJ ;
Arvidsson, D ;
Hansen, P ;
Callery, MP ;
Denis, R ;
Fowler, DL ;
Medich, DS ;
O'Reilly, MJ ;
Atlas, H ;
Himpens, JM ;
Swanstrom, LL ;
Arous, EJ ;
Pattyn, P ;
Yood, SM ;
Ricciardi, R ;
Sandor, A ;
Meyers, WC .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2000, 231 (05) :715-721
[7]   Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery - An overview [J].
Meijer, DW ;
Bannenberg, JJG ;
Jakimowicz, JJ .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2000, 14 (10) :891-895
[8]  
MUNVER R, 2003, CONT UROL, V15, P30
[9]   Hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: Comparison to open radical nephrectomy [J].
Nakada, SY ;
Fadden, P ;
Jarrard, DF ;
Moon, TD .
UROLOGY, 2001, 58 (04) :517-520
[10]  
Vargas HD, 2000, DIS COLON RECTUM, V43, P1726