Postoperative brachytherapy alone and combined postoperative radiotherapy and brachytherapy boost for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, with positive or close margins

被引:38
作者
Lapeyre, M
Bollet, MA
Racadot, S
Geoffrois, L
Kaminsky, MC
Hoffstetter, S
Dolivet, G
Toussaint, B
Luporsi, E
Peiffert, D
机构
[1] Ctr Alexis Vautrin, Dept Radiotherapy, F-54511 Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
[2] Ctr Alexis Vautrin, Dept Head & Neck Surg, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
[3] Hop Central, Dept Head & Neck Surg, Nancy, France
[4] Ctr Alexis Vautrin, Dept Med Oncol, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
来源
HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK | 2004年 / 26卷 / 03期
关键词
postoperative; brachytherapy; head and neck; squamous cell carcinoma; radiotherapy;
D O I
10.1002/hed.10377
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background. Postoperative radiotherapy is necessary for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oral cavity with positive or close margins. The aim of the study is to define the indications of postoperative brachytherapy (BRT). Methods. From 1979 to 1993, 82 patients with positive or close margins had postoperative BRT (58 T1-2, 24 T3-4, 45 mobile tongue, 37 floor of mouth). Forty-six patients had combined radiotherapy (FIT) with a mean dose of 48 Gy, and BRT boost with a mean dose of 24 Gy. Thirty-six patients had BRT alone with a mean dose of 60 Gy. BRT was performed with interstitial low dose rate Iridium 192. Results. Overall survival (OS), cause-specific survival (CSS), and local control (LC) at 5 years were, respectively, for T1-2/NON- with BRT, 75%, 85%, and 88%, and with RT-BRT 70%, 92%, and 92%; for T1-2/N+ with RT-BRT, 44%, 67%, and 78%; for T3-4/N- with RT-BRT, 42%, 90%, and 80%; and for T3-4/N+ with RT-BRT, 22%, 43%, and 57%. Prognostic factors for OS, CSS, and LC were N+ (p less than or equal to .009), extracapsular spread (ECS+; p less than or equal to .000001), and T stage for LC only (p = .02). Prognostic factors for complications were a high number of wires with a cutoff at five wires (p = .008), a high dose rate with a cutoff at 0.57 Gy/hr (p = .01), and a high total dose (BRT + RT) with a cutoff at 71 Gy (p = .07). Conclusions: BRT alone for SCC T1-2/NON- is better than RT-BRT because, with equivalent results, it avoids the adverse events of postoperative RT (xerostomia) and permits the treatment of a second head and neck primary in nonirradiated tissue. The results for the T3-4/N- are acceptable with this approach (ie, RT-BRT) but may be improved for N+. (C) 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 223
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] POSTOPERATIVE IRRADIATION FOR SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA OF THE HEAD AND NECK - AN ANALYSIS OF TREATMENT RESULTS AND COMPLICATIONS
    AMDUR, RJ
    PARSONS, JT
    MENDENHALL, WM
    MILLION, RR
    STRINGER, SP
    CASSISI, NJ
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1989, 16 (01): : 25 - 36
  • [2] MANAGEMENT OF SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA OF ORAL TONGUE AND FLOOR OF MOUTH AFTER EXCISIONAL BIOPSY
    ANGE, DW
    LINDBERG, RD
    GUILLAMONDEGUI, OM
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1975, 116 (01) : 143 - 146
  • [3] ACCELERATED VERSUS CONVENTIONAL FRACTIONATION IN THE POSTOPERATIVE IRRADIATION OF LOCALLY ADVANCED HEAD AND NECK-CANCER - INFLUENCE OF TUMOR PROLIFERATION
    AWWAD, HK
    KHAFAGY, Y
    BARSOUM, M
    EZZAT, S
    ELATTAR, I
    FARAG, H
    AKOUSH, H
    MEABID, H
    ZAGHLOUL, MS
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1992, 25 (04) : 261 - 266
  • [4] Close or positive margins after surgical resection for the head and neck cancer patient: The addition of brachytherapy improves local control
    Beitler, JJ
    Smith, RV
    Silver, CE
    Quish, A
    Deore, SM
    Mullokandov, E
    Fontela, DP
    Wadler, S
    Hayes, MK
    Vikram, B
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 40 (02): : 313 - 317
  • [5] Bernier J., 2001, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, V51, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0360-3016(01)01825-9
  • [6] PROGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC VALUE OF FROZEN SECTION DETERMINATIONS IN SURGICAL TREATMENT OF SQUAMOUS CARCINOMA OF HEAD AND NECK
    BYERS, RM
    BLAND, KI
    BORLASE, B
    LUNA, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1978, 136 (04) : 525 - 528
  • [7] Chao KSC, 1996, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V36, P1039
  • [8] Dutreix M, 1987, PARIS SYSTEM, P25
  • [9] ANALYSIS OF THE PARAMETERS RELATING TO FAILURES ABOVE THE CLAVICLES IN PATIENTS TREATED BY POSTOPERATIVE IRRADIATION FOR SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMAS OF THE ORAL CAVITY OR OROPHARYNX
    FELDMAN, M
    FLETCHER, GH
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1982, 8 (01): : 27 - 30
  • [10] GUERIF S, 1998, RADIOTHER ONCOL S1, V47, P35