The burdens of poverty during the COVID-19 pandemic

被引:4
作者
Petersen, Julia [1 ]
Hettich, Nora [1 ]
Baumkoetter, Rieke [2 ,3 ]
Wild, Philipp S. [2 ,3 ]
Pfeiffer, Norbert [4 ]
Muenzel, Thomas [5 ]
Koenig, Jochem [6 ]
Lackner, Karl J. [7 ]
Beutel, Manfred E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Mainz, Dept Psychosomat Med & Psychotherapy, Mainz, Germany
[2] Univ Med Ctr Mainz, Ctr Cardiol, Prevent Cardiol & Prevent Med, Mainz, Germany
[3] German Ctr Cardiovasc Res DZHK, Partner Site Rhine Main, Mainz, Germany
[4] Univ Med Ctr Mainz, Dept Ophthalmol, Mainz, Germany
[5] Univ Med Ctr Mainz, Ctr Cardiol, Mainz, Germany
[6] Univ Med Ctr Mainz, Inst Med Biostat Epidemiol & Informat, Div Pediat Epidemiol, Mainz, Germany
[7] Univ Med Ctr Mainz, Inst Clin Chem & Lab Med, Mainz, Germany
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; pandemic; poverty; economic burden; psychological stress; SOCIAL COHESION; MENTAL-HEALTH; LONELINESS; PATIENT; ANXIETY; CARE; DEPRIVATION; DEPRESSION; PREVALENCE; DISORDERS;
D O I
10.3389/fsoc.2022.995318
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
BackgroundIndividuals living at-risk-of-poverty have an increased risk of poor mental health. The pandemic and its societal impacts might have negative effects especially on this group widening the gap between rich and poor and also exacerbate gender gaps, which in turn might impact social cohesion. AimThe objective of this longitudinal study was to determine if people living at-risk-of-poverty were more vulnerable to economic and psychosocial impacts of the pandemic and showed poorer mental health. Moreover, gender differences were analyzed. MethodWe drew data from a sample of N = 10,250 respondents of two time points (T1 starting from October 2020, T2 starting from March 2021) of the Gutenberg COVID-19 Study. We tested for differences between people living at-risk-of-poverty and more affluent respondents regarding economic impacts, psychosocial stressors, as well as depressiveness, anxiety and loneliness, by comparing mean and distributional differences. To test for significant discrepancy, we opted for chi-square- and t-tests. ResultsThe analysis sample compromised N = 8,100 individuals of which 4,2% could be classified as living at-risk-of-poverty. 23% of respondents living at-risk-of-poverty had a decrease in income since the beginning of the pandemic-twice as many as those not living at-risk-of-poverty, who reported more often an increase in income. Less affluent individuals reported a decrease in working hours, while more affluent people reported an increase. Between our survey time points, we found a significant decrease in these economic impacts. Gender differences for economic changes were only found for more affluent women who worked more hours with no change in income. Less affluent respondents were more impacted by psychosocial stressors, depressiveness, anxiety, and loneliness. Gender differences were found particularly with regard to care responsibilities. DiscussionOur results indicate a widening in the gap between the rich and the poor at the beginning of the pandemic. Gender differences concerning economic changes affect more affluent women, but women in both income groups are more burdened by care responsibilities, which might indicate a heightened resurgence of gender role in times of crisis. This increase in inequality might have impacted social cohesion.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Inequality in the impact of the coronavirus shock: Evidence from real time surveys [J].
Adams-Prassl, Abi ;
Boneva, Teodora ;
Golin, Marta ;
Rauh, Christopher .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2020, 189
[2]  
Alon T., 2021, From Mancession to Shecession: Women's Employment in Regular and Pandemic Recessions
[3]   Poverty dynamics in Germany: Evidence on the relationship between persistent poverty and health behavior [J].
Aue, Katja ;
Roosen, Jutta ;
Jensen, Helen H. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2016, 153 :62-70
[4]   Prevalence and Sociodemographic Predictors of Mental Health in a Representative Sample of Young Adults from Germany, Israel, Poland, and Slovenia: A Longitudinal Study during the COVID-19 Pandemic [J].
Benatov, Joy ;
Ochnik, Dominika ;
Rogowska, Aleksandra M. ;
Arzensek, Ana ;
Mars Bitenc, Ursa .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (03)
[5]   Psychological impact of the quarantine during the COVID-19 pandemic on the general European adult population: a systematic review of the evidence [J].
Bonati, M. ;
Campi, R. ;
Segre, G. .
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRIC SCIENCES, 2022, 31
[6]   Coming together or coming apart? Changes in social cohesion during the Covid-19 pandemic in England [J].
Borkowska, Magda ;
Laurence, James .
EUROPEAN SOCIETIES, 2021, 23 :S618-S636
[7]   A longitudinal study of psychological distress in the United States before and during the COVID-19 pandemic [J].
Breslau, Joshua ;
Finucane, Melissa L. ;
Locker, Alicia R. ;
Baird, Matthew D. ;
Roth, Elizabeth A. ;
Collins, Rebecca L. .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 143
[8]   Prevalence of Exposure to Potentially Traumatic Events in a Healthy Birth Cohort of Very Young Children in the Northeastern United States [J].
Briggs-Gowan, Margaret J. ;
Ford, Julian D. ;
Fraleigh, Lisa ;
McCarthy, Kimberly ;
Carter, Alice S. .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMATIC STRESS, 2010, 23 (06) :725-733
[9]   A literature review of the economics of COVID-19 [J].
Brodeur, Abel ;
Gray, David ;
Islam, Anik ;
Bhuiyan, Suraiya .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, 2021, 35 (04) :1007-1044
[10]   Who is lonely in lockdown? Cross-cohort analyses of predictors of loneliness before and during the COVID-19 pandemic [J].
Bu, F. ;
Steptoe, A. ;
Fancourt, D. .
PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 186 :31-34