Quality of life: A dynamic construct

被引:273
作者
Allison, PJ
Locker, D
Feine, JS
机构
[1] MCGILL UNIV, FAC DENT, MONTREAL, PQ H3A 2B2, CANADA
[2] UNIV TORONTO, SCH DENT, COMMUN DENT HLTH SERV RES UNIT, TORONTO, ON M5G 1G6, CANADA
[3] MCGILL UNIV, DEPT BIOSTAT & EPIDEMIOL, FAC MED, MONTREAL, PQ H3A 2B2, CANADA
关键词
adaptation; measurement; quality of life; response-shift bias;
D O I
10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00339-5
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The principle of Einstein's theory of special relativity is that an observer of an apparently moving body cannot be sure if the body really has moved, if he/she has moved or if both events have occurred. Although Einstein was discussing physical events, a similar hypothesis may apply to quality of life. When using quality of life instruments, one presumes that the point of reference (the observer in Einstein's terms) does not move, i.e. that an individual's attitude towards a particular construct will remain stable. Otherwise, changes in response to particular variables cannot be interpreted. However, attitudes are not constant: they vary with time and experience and are modified by such psychological phenomena as adaptation, coping, expectancy, optimism, self-control and self-concept. For example, eating problems may be extremely important at one point in a person's life. However, when oral discomfort has been diagnosed as cancer and treated with surgery or radiation, the same individual may ''objectively'' demonstrate more problems when eating, but report them as less because they have now become relatively unimportant. Furthermore, paradoxical reports that some groups of ill individuals rate their quality of life higher than do ''healthy'' persons raise similar questions concerning between-group point of reference differences. Investigators in the fields of organisational management, education and psychology have developed techniques such as ''then ratings'', saliency indicators and individualised questionnaires in attempts to quantify within-subject variability and between-group differences pertaining to point of reference; We suggest that similar methods may help us to measure change in the impact of the different items of quality of life instruments; In this paper, we will describe the theories of change associated with quality of life measurement. In addition, we will present evidence suggesting that the point of reference does change, the reasons for this and possible solutions to the problem. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 230
页数:10
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   MEASURES OF SELF-REPORTED WELL-BEING - THEIR AFFECTIVE, COGNITIVE, AND OTHER COMPONENTS [J].
ANDREWS, FM ;
MCKENNELL, AC .
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 1980, 8 (02) :127-155
[2]   SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE [J].
BANDURA, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) :191-215
[3]   THE PSYCHOLOGY OF CHANCE ENCOUNTERS AND LIFE PATHS [J].
BANDURA, A .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1982, 37 (07) :747-755
[4]   UNDERREPORTING BY CANCER-PATIENTS - THE CASE OF RESPONSE-SHIFT [J].
BREETVELT, IS ;
VANDAM, FSAM .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1991, 32 (09) :981-987
[5]   LOTTERY WINNERS AND ACCIDENT VICTIMS - IS HAPPINESS RELATIVE [J].
BRICKMAN, P ;
COATES, D ;
JANOFFBULMAN, R .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1978, 36 (08) :917-927
[6]   THE AFFECTIVE CONSEQUENCES OF SOCIAL-COMPARISON - EITHER DIRECTION HAS ITS UPS AND DOWNS [J].
BUUNK, BP ;
TAYLOR, SE ;
DAKOF, GA ;
COLLINS, RL ;
VANYPEREN, NW .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 59 (06) :1238-1249
[7]   QUALITY OF LIFE IN CANCER-PATIENTS - AN HYPOTHESIS [J].
CALMAN, KC .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 1984, 10 (03) :124-127
[8]   SUBJECTIVE MEASURES OF WELL-BEING [J].
CAMPBELL, A .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1976, 31 (02) :117-124
[9]   CONTROL-THEORY - A USEFUL CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK FOR PERSONALITY-SOCIAL, CLINICAL, AND HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY [J].
CARVER, CS ;
SCHEIER, MF .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1982, 92 (01) :111-135
[10]   A PSYCHOLOGICAL COMPARISON OF PATIENTS WITH MALIGNANT-MELANOMA AND OTHER DERMATOLOGIC DISORDERS [J].
CASSILETH, BR ;
LUSK, EJ ;
TENAGLIA, AN .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1982, 7 (06) :742-746