Reconstructing Constructivism: Causal Models, Bayesian Learning Mechanisms, and the Theory Theory

被引:351
作者
Gopnik, Alison [1 ]
Wellman, Henry M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Psychol, Berkeley, CA 94704 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Psychol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
cognitive development; Bayesian inference; theory of mind; causal knowledge; intuitive theories; YOUNG-CHILDREN; FALSE-BELIEF; PROBABILISTIC MODELS; MIND; INFANTS; LANGUAGE; KNOWLEDGE; INFER; STATISTICS; INSIDES;
D O I
10.1037/a0028044
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We propose a new version of the "theory theory" grounded in the computational framework of probabilistic causal models and Bayesian learning. Probabilistic models allow a constructivist but rigorous and detailed approach to cognitive development. They also explain the learning of both more specific causal hypotheses and more abstract framework theories. We outline the new theoretical ideas, explain the computational framework in an intuitive and nontechnical way, and review an extensive but relatively recent body of empirical results that supports these ideas. These include new studies of the mechanisms of learning. Children infer causal structure from statistical information, through their own actions on the world and through observations of the actions of others. Studies demonstrate these learning mechanisms in children from 16 months to 4 years old and include research on causal statistical learning, informal experimentation through play, and imitation and informal pedagogy. They also include studies of the variability and progressive character of intuitive theory change, particularly theory of mind. These studies investigate both the physical and the psychological and social domains. We conclude with suggestions for further collaborative projects between developmental and computational cognitive scientists.
引用
收藏
页码:1085 / 1108
页数:24
相关论文
共 163 条
[51]   The situativity of knowing, learning, and research [J].
Greeno, JG .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1998, 53 (01) :5-26
[52]  
Griffiths T., 2007, Causal learning: Psychology, philosophy, and computation, P323, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195176803.003.0021
[53]   Bayes and Blickets: Effects of Knowledge on Causal Induction in Children and Adults [J].
Griffiths, Thomas L. ;
Sobel, David M. ;
Tenenbaum, Joshua B. ;
Gopnik, Alison .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2011, 35 (08) :1407-1455
[54]   Probabilistic models of cognition: exploring representations and inductive biases [J].
Griffiths, Thomas L. ;
Chater, Nick ;
Kemp, Charles ;
Perfors, Amy ;
Tenenbaum, Joshua B. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2010, 14 (08) :357-364
[55]   Theory-Based Causal Induction [J].
Griffiths, Thomas L. ;
Tenenbaum, Joshua B. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2009, 116 (04) :661-716
[56]   16-Month-Olds Rationally Infer Causes of Failed Actions [J].
Gweon, Hyowon ;
Schulz, Laura .
SCIENCE, 2011, 332 (6037) :1524-1524
[57]   Infants consider both the sample and the sampling process in inductive generalization [J].
Gweon, Hyowon ;
Tenenbaum, Joshua B. ;
Schulz, Laura E. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (20) :9066-9071
[58]  
Heckerman D, 1999, COMPUTATION, CAUSATION, AND DISCOVERY, P141
[59]  
Hirsh-Pasek K., 2003, Einstein never used flash cards: How our children really learn and why they need to play more and memorize less
[60]  
Horner V., 2005, Animal Cognition, V8, P164, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10071-004-0239-6