Breast tumor classification using different features of quantitative ultrasound parametric images

被引:32
|
作者
Hsu, Soa-Min [1 ]
Kuo, Wen-Hung [2 ]
Kuo, Fang-Chuan [3 ]
Liao, Yin-Yin [4 ]
机构
[1] Kuang Tien Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Taichung, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Hungkuang Univ, Dept Phys Therapy, Taichung, Taiwan
[4] Hungkuang Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, 1018,Sect 6,Taiwan Blvd Rd, Taichung 43302, Taiwan
关键词
Breast ultrasound; Morphological features; Texture features; Nakagami parameter; Classification; COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS; SHEAR-WAVE ELASTOGRAPHY; TEXTURE ANALYSIS; BENIGN; MASSES; SEGMENTATION; LESIONS; US; PERFORMANCE; SONOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1007/s11548-018-01908-8
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Rationale and objectivesThe ultrasound B-mode-based morphological and texture analysis and Nakagami parametric imaging have been proposed to characterize breast tumors. Since these three feature categories of ultrasonic tissue characterization supply information on different physical characteristics of breast tumors, by combining the above methods is expected to provide more clues for classifying breast tumors.Materials and methodsTo verify the validity of the concept, raw data were obtained from 160 clinical cases. Six different types of morphological-feature parameters, four texture features, and the Nakagami parameter of benignancy and malignancy were extracted for evaluation. The Pearson's correlation matrix was used to calculate the correlation between different feature parameters. The fuzzy c-means clustering and stepwise regression techniques were utilized to determine the optimal feature set, respectively. The logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic curve, and support vector machine were used to estimate the diagnostic ability.ResultsThe best performance was obtained by combining morphological-feature parameter (e.g., standard deviation of the shortest distance), texture feature (e.g., variance), and the Nakagami parameter, with an accuracy of 89.4%, a specificity of 86.3%, a sensitivity of 92.5%, and an area under receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.96. There was no significant difference between using fuzzy c-means clustering, logistic regression, and support vector machine based on the optimal feature set for breast tumors classification.ConclusionTherefore, we verified that different physical ultrasonic features are functionally complementary and thus improve the performance in diagnosing breast tumors. Moreover, the optimal feature set had the maximum discriminating performance should be irrelative to the power of classifiers.
引用
收藏
页码:623 / 633
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Robust phase-based texture descriptor for classification of breast ultrasound images
    Cai, Lingyun
    Wang, Xin
    Wang, Yuanyuan
    Guo, Yi
    Yu, Jinhua
    Wang, Yi
    BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING ONLINE, 2015, 14 : 1
  • [22] Computer-aided classification of breast masses using speckle features of automated breast ultrasound images
    Moon, Woo Kyung
    Lo, Chung-Ming
    Chang, Jung Min
    Huang, Chiun-Sheng
    Chen, Jeon-Hor
    Chang, Ruey-Feng
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (10) : 6465 - 6473
  • [23] Benign and malignant classification of breast tumor ultrasound images using conventional radiomics and transfer learning features: A multicenter retrospective study
    Tian, Ronghui
    Lu, Guoxiu
    Tang, Shiting
    Sang, Liang
    Ma, He
    Qian, Wei
    Yang, Wei
    MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2024, 125
  • [24] Classification of breast lesions using quantitative ultrasound biomarkers
    Nizam, Navid Ibtehaj
    Ara, Sharmin R.
    Hasan, Md Kamrul
    BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL, 2020, 57
  • [25] Classification of breast lesions using segmented quantitative ultrasound maps of homodyned K distribution parameters
    Byra, Michal
    Nowicki, Andrzej
    Wroblewska-Piotrzkowska, Hanna
    Dobruch-Sobczak, Katarzyna
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (10) : 5561 - 5569
  • [26] ATTENTION-ENRICHED DEEP LEARNING MODEL FOR BREAST TUMOR SEGMENTATION IN ULTRASOUND IMAGES
    Vakanski, Aleksandar
    Xian, Min
    Freer, Phoebe E.
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 46 (10): : 2819 - 2833
  • [27] Towards Optimal Cropping: Breast and Liver Tumor Classification using Ultrasound Images
    Hassan, Tahir
    AlZoubi, Alaa
    Du, Hongbo
    Jassim, Sabah
    MULTIMODAL IMAGE EXPLOITATION AND LEARNING 2021, 2021, 11734
  • [28] Combination Ultrasound and Mammography for Breast Cancer Classification using Deep Learning
    Chunhapran, Orawan
    Yampaka, Tongjai
    2021 18TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (JCSSE-2021), 2021,
  • [29] A deep learning framework for supporting the classification of breast lesions in ultrasound images
    Han, Seokmin
    Kang, Ho-Kyung
    Jeong, Ja-Yeon
    Park, Moon-Ho
    Kim, Wonsik
    Bang, Won-Chul
    Seong, Yeong-Kyeong
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2017, 62 (19): : 7714 - 7728
  • [30] Breast Cancer Tumor Classification Using a Bag of Deep Multi-Resolution Convolutional Features
    Clement, David
    Agu, Emmanuel
    Obayemi, John
    Adeshina, Steve
    Soboyejo, Wole
    INFORMATICS-BASEL, 2022, 9 (04):