Fetal growth restriction and intra-uterine growth restriction: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians

被引:178
|
作者
Vayssiere, C. [1 ,2 ]
Sentilhes, L. [3 ]
Ego, A. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Bernard, C. [7 ]
Cambourieu, D. [8 ]
Flamant, C. [9 ]
Gascoin, G. [10 ]
Gaudineau, A. [11 ]
Grange, G. [12 ]
Houfflin-Debarge, V. [13 ]
Langer, B. [11 ]
Malan, V. [14 ]
Marcorelles, P. [15 ]
Nizard, J. [16 ]
Perrotin, F. [17 ]
Salomon, L. [18 ]
Senat, M. -V. [19 ]
Serry, A. [7 ]
Tessier, V. [19 ]
Truffert, P. [20 ]
Tsatsaris, V. [12 ]
Arnaud, C. [2 ]
Carbonne, B. [21 ]
机构
[1] CHU Toulouse, Hop Paule de Viguier, Serv Gynecol Obstet, F-31059 Toulouse, France
[2] Univ Toulouse 3, INSERM UMR1027, F-31062 Toulouse, France
[3] CHU Angers, Serv Gynecol Obstet, Angers, France
[4] Univ Grenoble Alpes, TIMC IMAG, Grenoble, France
[5] CNRS, TIMC IMAG, Grenoble, France
[6] CHU Grenoble, Pole Sante Publ, F-38043 Grenoble, France
[7] Collectif Interassociatif Autour Naissance, Paris, France
[8] Cabinet Med, Lyon, France
[9] CHU Nantes, Hop Mere Enfant, Serv Reanimat & Med Neonatales, F-44035 Nantes 01, France
[10] CHU Angers, Pole Femme Mere Enfant, Serv Reanimat & Med Neonatales, Angers, France
[11] Hop Univ Strasbourg, Dept Obstet Gynecol, Strasbourg, France
[12] Hop Hotel Dieu, Grp Hosp Cochin, Maternite Port Royal, Paris, France
[13] CHU Lille, Hop Jeanne de Flandre, Pole Femme Mere Nouveau Ne, Clin Obstet, F-59037 Lille, France
[14] Hop Univ Necker Enfants Malad, Cytogenet, Paris, France
[15] CHRU Brest, Hop Morvan, Pole Biol Pathol, Serv Anat Pathol, Brest, France
[16] CHU Pitie Salpetriere, Serv Gynecol Obstet, Paris, France
[17] CHRU Tours, Ctr Olympe Gouges, Pole Gynecol Obstet Med Foetale Med & Biol Reprod, Tours, France
[18] Hop Univ Necker Enfants Malad, Maternite, Paris, France
[19] Hop Bicetre, Serv Gynecol Obstet, Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
[20] CHRU Lille, Hop Jeanne de Flandre, Serv Reanimat Neonatale, F-59037 Lille, France
[21] Univ Paris 06, Hop Trousseau, AP HP, Unite Obstet Maternite, F-75252 Paris 05, France
关键词
Small for gestational age; Fetal growth restriction; Adjusted fetal weight curves; FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE; IUGR; RETARDATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.06.021
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Small for gestational age (SGA) is defined by weight (in utero estimated fetal weight or birth weight) below the 10th percentile (professional consensus). Severe SGA is SGA below the third percentile (professional consensus). Fetal growth restriction (FGR) or intra-uterine growth restriction (IUGR) usually correspond with SGA associated with evidence indicating abnormal growth (with or without abnormal uterine and/or umbilical Doppler): arrest of growth or a shift in its rate measured longitudinally (at least two measurements, 3 weeks apart) (professional consensus). More rarely, they may correspond with inadequate growth, with weight near the 10th percentile without being SGA (LE2). Birthweight curves are not appropriate for the identification of SGA at early gestational ages because of the disorders associated with preterm delivery. In utero curves represent physiological growth more reliably (LE2). In diagnostic (or reference) ultrasound, the use of growth curves adjusted for maternal height and weight, parity and fetal sex is recommended (professional consensus). In screening, the use of adjusted curves must be assessed in pilot regions to determine the schedule for their subsequent introduction at national level. This choice is based on evidence of feasibility and the absence of any proven benefits for individualized curves for perinatal health in the general population (professional consensus). Children born with FGR or SGA have a higher risk of minor cognitive deficits, school problems and metabolic syndrome in adulthood. The role of preterm delivery in these complications is linked. The measurement of fundal height remains relevant to screening after 22 weeks of gestation (Grade C). The biometric ultrasound indicators recommended are: head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL) (professional consensus). They allow calculation of estimated fetal weight (EFW), which, with AC, is the most relevant indicator for screening. Hadlock's EFW/formula with three indicators (HC, AC and FL) should ideally be used (Grade B). The ultrasound report must specify the percentile of the EFW (Grade C). Verification of the date of conception is essential. It is based on the crown-rump length between 11 and 14 weeks of gestation (Grade A). The MC, AC and FL measurements must be related to the appropriate reference curves (professional consensus); those modelled from College Francais d'Echographie Fetale data are recommended because they are multicentere French curves (professional consensus). Whether or not a work-up should be performed and its content depend on the context (gestational age, severity of biometric abnormalities, other ultrasound data, parents' wishes, etc.) (professional consensus). Such a work-up only makes sense if it might modify pregnancy management and, in particular, if it has the potential to reduce perinatal and long-term morbidity and mortality (professional consensus). The use of umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry is associated with better newborn health status in populations at risk, especially in those with FGR (Grade A). This Doppler examination must be the first-line tool for surveillance of fetuses with SGA and FGR (professional consensus). A course of corticosteroids is recommended for women with an FGR fetus, and for whom delivery before 34 weeks of gestation is envisaged (Grade C). Magnesium sulphate should be prescribed for preterm deliveries before 32-33 weeks of gestation (Grade A). The same management should apply for preterm FGR deliveries (Grade C). In cases of FGR, fetal growth must be monitored at intervals of no less than 2 weeks, and ideally 3 weeks (professional consensus). Referral to a Level IIb or III maternity ward must be proposed in cases of EFW<1500 g, potential birth before 32-34 weeks of gestation (absent or reversed umbilical end-diastolic flow, abnormal venous Doppler) or a fetal disease associated with any of these (professional consensus). Systematic caesarean deliveries for FGR are not recommended (Grade C). In cases of vaginal delivery, fetal heart rate must be monitored continuously during labour, and any delay before intervention must be faster than in low-risk situations (professional consensus). Regional anaesthesia is preferred in trials of vaginal delivery, as in planned caesareans. Morbidity and mortality are higher in SGA newborns than in normal-weight newborns of the same gestational age (LE3). The risk of neonatal mortality is two to four times higher in SGA newborns than in non-SGA preterm and full-term infants (LE2). Initial management of an SGA newborn includes combatting hypothermia by maintaining the heat chain (survival blanket), ventilation with a pressure-controlled insufflator, if necessary, and close monitoring of capillary blood glucose (professional consensus). Testing for antiphospholipids (anticardiolipin, circulating anticoagulant, anti-beta2-GPI) is recommended in women with previous severe FGR (below third percentile) that led to birth before 34 weeks of gestation (professional consensus). It is recommended that aspirin should be prescribed to women with a history of pre-eclampsia before 34 weeks of gestation, and/or FGR below the fifth percentile with a probable vascular origin (professional consensus). Aspirin must be taken in the evening or at least 8 h after awakening (Grade B), before 16 weeks of gestation, at a dose of 100-160 mg/day (Grade A). (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 18
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Management of infants with intra-uterine growth restriction
    Deorari, Ashok K.
    Agarwal, Ramesh
    Paul, Vinod K.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2008, 75 (02) : 171 - 174
  • [2] Management of infants with intra-uterine growth restriction
    Ashok K. Deorari
    Ramesh Agarwal
    Vinod K. Paul
    The Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 2008, 75 : 171 - 174
  • [3] Postnatal nutritional restriction affects growth and immune function of piglets with intra-uterine growth restriction
    Hu, Liang
    Liu, Yan
    Yan, Chuan
    Peng, Xie
    Xu, Qin
    Xuan, Yue
    Han, Fei
    Tian, Gang
    Fang, Zhengfeng
    Lin, Yan
    Xu, Shengyu
    Zhang, Keying
    Chen, Daiwen
    Wu, De
    Che, Lianqiang
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2015, 114 (01) : 53 - 62
  • [4] Postpartum practice: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF)
    Senat, Marie-Victoire
    Sentilhes, Loic
    Battut, Anne
    Benhamou, Dan
    Bydlowski, Sarah
    Chantry, Anne
    Deffieux, Xavier
    Diers, Flore
    Doret, Muriel
    Ducroux-Schouwey, Chantal
    Fuchs, Florent
    Gascoin, Geraldine
    Lebot, Chantal
    Marcellin, Louis
    Plu-Bureau, Genevieve
    Raccah-Tebeka, Brigitte
    Simon, Emmanuel
    Breart, Gerard
    Marpeau, Loic
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2016, 202 : 1 - 8
  • [5] Cullins in Human Intra-Uterine Growth Restriction: Expressional and Epigenetic Alterations
    Gascoin-Lachambre, G.
    Buffat, C.
    Rebourcet, R.
    Chelbi, S. T.
    Rigourd, V.
    Mondon, F.
    Mignot, T-M.
    Legras, E.
    Simeoni, U.
    Vaiman, D.
    Barbaux, S.
    PLACENTA, 2010, 31 (02) : 151 - 157
  • [6] Placental pathologies associated with intra-uterine fetal growth restriction complicated with and without oligohydramnios
    Liat Apel-Sarid
    Amalia Levy
    Gershon Holcberg
    Eyal Sheiner
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2009, 280 : 549 - 552
  • [7] Placental pathologies associated with intra-uterine fetal growth restriction complicated with and without oligohydramnios
    Apel-Sarid, Liat
    Levy, Amalia
    Holcberg, Gershon
    Sheiner, Eyal
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2009, 280 (04) : 549 - 552
  • [8] Fetal lactic dehydrogenase variation in normal pregnancy and in cases of severe intra-uterine growth restriction
    Verspyck, E
    Gaillard, G
    Parnet, F
    Marret, S
    Marpeau, L
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 1999, 19 (03) : 229 - 233
  • [9] A systematic review and critical evaluation of quality of clinical practice guidelines on fetal growth restriction
    Alameddine, Sara
    Capannolo, Giulia
    Rizzo, Giuseppe
    Khalil, Asma
    Di Girolamo, Raffaella
    Iacovella, Carlotta
    Liberati, Marco
    Patrizi, Lodovico
    Acharya, Ganesh
    Odibo, Anthony O.
    D'Antonio, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2023, 51 (08) : 970 - 980
  • [10] Intrauterine growth restriction: comparison of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists practice bulletin with other national guidelines
    Chauhan, Suneet P.
    Gupta, Lata M.
    Hendrix, Nancy W.
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 200 (04) : 409.e1 - 409.e6