WHY IS THE AGRICULTURAL LOBBY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION MEMBER STATES SO EFFECTIVE?

被引:0
|
作者
Bednarikova, Zuzana
Jilkova, Jirina
机构
来源
E & M EKONOMIE A MANAGEMENT | 2012年 / 15卷 / 02期
关键词
agricultural lobby; interest group; rent seeking; Agrarian Chamber of the Czech Republic; NEOLIBERAL PROJECT; POLITICAL-ECONOMY; POLICY; COMMUNITY; AUSTRALIA; REFORM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper tries to answer the question 'what is the power of the agricultural lobby, as the interest group which causes that EU member states continue to invest in a costly and ineffective agricultural policy. Mediating interests in the EU Member States, as demonstrated in the case of the Czech Republic, are discussed. Czech agriculture bears the heritage of an extensively collectivised sector. The case study demonstrates the efforts of a new Member State to modernise in the area of professionally mediated interests while at the same time the controversial role of agricultural organisations in the competitive fight for agricultural subsidies. The strong position of the lobby, and agricultural lobbies, is primarily based on the unity and the unilateral nature of their interests, the excellent organisation when promoting these interests, the ability to gain the sympathy of politicians, consumers and tax payers, the existence of relatively small and homogenous groups and, last but not least, their abilities at pointing out the fact that agriculture has an irreplaceable role in society and the national and international economy. The liberalisation of agriculture depends on a successful fall in the importance and voter strength of the agricultural sector and its sympathisers and a balancing of its natural political advantages. Strong elements supporting the liberalisation of agriculture are also sustainable development and modernisation of the agricultural sector and the sustainable economic development, distancing itself from agricultural roots. Generally, it is evident that because of the liberal, even if limited, reforms of the European agricultural policy, the weakening of the agricultural lobby power can be expected.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 37
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Subsistence farming, incomes, and agricultural livelihoods in the new member states of the European Union
    Davidova, Sophia
    Fredriksson, Lena
    Gorton, Matthew
    Mishev, Plamen
    Petrovici, Dan
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2012, 30 (02): : 209 - 227
  • [2] Living Cost Gap in the European Union Member States
    Kucas, Andrius
    Kavalov, Boyan
    Lavalle, Carlo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (21) : 1 - 26
  • [3] Environmental Taxes in the Member States of the European Union-Trends in Energy Taxes
    Famulska, Teresa
    Kaczmarzyk, Jan
    Grzaba-Wloszek, Malgorzata
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (22)
  • [4] Comparing Constitutional Change in European Union Member States: In Search of a Theory
    Karlsson, Christer
    JCMS-JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES, 2014, 52 (03) : 566 - 581
  • [5] Multilevel Governance and Shared Sovereignty: European Union, Member States, and the FCTC
    Mamudu, Hadii M.
    Studlar, Donley T.
    GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLICY ADMINISTRATION AND INSTITUTIONS, 2009, 22 (01): : 73 - 97
  • [6] Federalism and the Regulation of Agricultural Biotechnology in the United States and European Union
    Sheingate, Adam D.
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE POLICY ANALYSIS, 2009, 11 (04): : 477 - 497
  • [7] Assessment of the Feasibility of Energy Transformation Processes in European Union Member States
    Pietrzak, Michal Bernard
    Olczyk, Magdalena
    Kuc-Czarnecka, Marta Ewa
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (02)
  • [8] Five Years After: New Member States in the European Union.
    Lastic, Erik
    SOCIOLOGIA, 2010, 42 (01): : 33 - 53
  • [9] Yoghurt and probiotic bacteria in dietary guidelines of the member states of the European Union
    Smug, L. N.
    Salminen, S.
    Sanders, M. E.
    Ebner, S.
    BENEFICIAL MICROBES, 2014, 5 (01) : 61 - 66
  • [10] Obstinate and Inefficient: Why Member States Do Not Comply With European Law
    Boerzel, Tanja A.
    Hofmann, Tobias
    Panke, Diana
    Sprungk, Carina
    COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 2010, 43 (11) : 1363 - 1390