Comparing teaching approaches in two student-designed games units

被引:16
作者
Andre, Mauro [1 ]
Hastie, Peter [2 ]
机构
[1] Leeds Beckett Univ, Carnegie Fac, Sch Sport, Phys Educ, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Auburn Univ, Sch Kinesiol, Sport Pedag, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
关键词
Student-designed games; games invention; games creation; child-designed games; physical education; information and communication technology (ICT);
D O I
10.1177/1356336X16681955
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
A student-designed games (SDG) teaching unit could be described as the process in which students create, organise, practice and refine their own games within certain limits established by the teacher. This study compared how two different teaching approaches had an impact on students and their teacher. The researcher taught two SDG units to junior high school students. The information and communication technology (ICT) teaching approach provided students with the opportunity to design their games online beyond class time. The non-technological (NT) teaching approach provided a more traditional approach, having students designing their games with face-to-face interactions. Using a case study methodology, four different data collection methods were used: field note observations, Edmodo posts, interviews, and lesson plans. Both teaching approaches presented positive and challenging outcomes, with key differences being found. For teachers, these were: (i) introducing students to new culture; (ii) providing resources to support game design; (iii) teacher direction of student work; and (iv) the degree of linearity in students' work. For students, the main differences were: (i) students' overall engagement; (ii) intra-group and inter-group interactions; and (iii) the quality of playbooks. The ICT teaching approach was considered a more difficult teaching methodology that required more experience with SDG, constructivism, and ICT. Nevertheless, the ICT teaching approach also provided more equity among students as they were given more opportunity to share their ideas in online discussions. Future research may consider a hybrid model that focuses on the major benefits that can be derived from each teaching approach.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 239
页数:15
相关论文
共 28 条
[21]   Girly Girls Can Play Games Las Ninas Pueden Jugar Tambien: Co-Creating a Curriculum of Possibilities With Fifth-Grade Girls [J].
Oliver, Kimberly L. ;
Hamzeh, Manal ;
McCaughtry, Nate .
JOURNAL OF TEACHING IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION, 2009, 28 (01) :90-110
[22]  
Rovegno I., 1994, Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, V65, P60
[23]  
Rovengno I., 1995, Teaching Elementary Physical Education, V6, P1
[24]   Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): The Development and Validation of an Assessment Instrument for Preservice Teachers [J].
Schmidt, Denise A. ;
Baran, Evrim ;
Thompson, Ann D. ;
Mishra, Punya ;
Koehler, Matthew J. ;
Shin, Tae S. .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION, 2009, 42 (02) :123-149
[25]  
Smith M.D., 1991, The Physical Educator, V48, P184
[26]  
Stake R.E., 2005, SAGE HDB QUALITATIVE, V3rd, P443, DOI DOI 10.1108/09504120610655394
[27]  
Thorpe R., 1984, BULL PHYS EDUC, V20, P24
[28]   Knowledge building and the quantity, content and quality of the interaction and participation of students in an online collaborative learning environment [J].
Yucel, Ummuhan Avci ;
Usluel, Yasemin Kocak .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2016, 97 :31-48