Comparing teaching approaches in two student-designed games units

被引:16
作者
Andre, Mauro [1 ]
Hastie, Peter [2 ]
机构
[1] Leeds Beckett Univ, Carnegie Fac, Sch Sport, Phys Educ, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Auburn Univ, Sch Kinesiol, Sport Pedag, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
关键词
Student-designed games; games invention; games creation; child-designed games; physical education; information and communication technology (ICT);
D O I
10.1177/1356336X16681955
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
A student-designed games (SDG) teaching unit could be described as the process in which students create, organise, practice and refine their own games within certain limits established by the teacher. This study compared how two different teaching approaches had an impact on students and their teacher. The researcher taught two SDG units to junior high school students. The information and communication technology (ICT) teaching approach provided students with the opportunity to design their games online beyond class time. The non-technological (NT) teaching approach provided a more traditional approach, having students designing their games with face-to-face interactions. Using a case study methodology, four different data collection methods were used: field note observations, Edmodo posts, interviews, and lesson plans. Both teaching approaches presented positive and challenging outcomes, with key differences being found. For teachers, these were: (i) introducing students to new culture; (ii) providing resources to support game design; (iii) teacher direction of student work; and (iv) the degree of linearity in students' work. For students, the main differences were: (i) students' overall engagement; (ii) intra-group and inter-group interactions; and (iii) the quality of playbooks. The ICT teaching approach was considered a more difficult teaching methodology that required more experience with SDG, constructivism, and ICT. Nevertheless, the ICT teaching approach also provided more equity among students as they were given more opportunity to share their ideas in online discussions. Future research may consider a hybrid model that focuses on the major benefits that can be derived from each teaching approach.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 239
页数:15
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Almond L., 1983, BULL PHYS EDUC, V19, P32
[2]  
André MH, 2009, MOTRIZ, V15, P284
[3]  
Butler J., 2016, Playing fair
[4]  
Butler J., 2011, Active Healthy, V18, P5
[5]   Stages for Children Inventing Games [J].
Butler, Joy .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION RECREATION AND DANCE, 2013, 84 (04) :48-53
[6]   Examining student-designed games through Suits' theory of games [J].
Casey, Ashley ;
Hastie, Peter ;
Jump, Steve .
SPORT EDUCATION AND SOCIETY, 2016, 21 (08) :1230-1248
[7]   Student learning during a unit of student-designed games [J].
Casey, Ashley ;
Hastie, Peter A. ;
Rovegno, Inez .
PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND SPORT PEDAGOGY, 2011, 16 (04) :331-350
[8]   Students and teacher responses to a unit of student-designed games [J].
Casey, Ashley ;
Hastie, Peter A. .
PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND SPORT PEDAGOGY, 2011, 16 (03) :295-312
[9]  
Cox R., 1988, Scottish Journal of Physical Education, V16, P14
[10]  
Curtner-Smith M. D., 1996, Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, V67, P33