Addressing Burnout Syndrome From a Critical Care Specialty Organization Perspective

被引:2
作者
Cochran, Kathryn L. [1 ]
Doo, Kathleen [2 ]
Squires, Allison [3 ]
Shah, Tina [4 ]
Rinne, Seppo [5 ]
Mealer, Meredith [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Anschutz Med Campus,12631 E 17th Ave,Rm 1201G, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[2] Permanents Med Grp, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, Oakland, CA USA
[3] NYU, NYU Rory Meyers Coll Nursing, New York, NY USA
[4] WellStar Hlth Syst, Practice Improvement, Atlanta, GA USA
[5] Boston Univ, Pulm Ctr, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[6] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Aurora, CO USA
关键词
job satisfaction; occupational stress; professional burnout; PHYSICIANS; PREVALENCE; CLINICIAN;
D O I
10.4037/aacnacc2020579
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Health care specialty organizations are an important resource for their membership; however, it is not clear how specialty societies should approach combating stress and burnout on an organizational scale. Objective: To understand the prevalence of burnout syndrome in American Thoracic Society members, identify specialty-specific risk factors, and generate strategies for health care societies to combat burnout. Methods: Cross-sectional, mixed-methods survey in a sample of 2018 American Thoracic Society International Conference attendees to assess levels of burnout syndrome, work satisfaction, and stress. Results: Of the 130 respondents, 69% reported high stress, 38% met burnout criteria, and 20% confirmed chaotic work environments. Significant associations included sex and stress level; clinical time and at-home electronic health record work; and US practice and at-home electronic health record work. There were no significant associations between burnout syndrome and the selected demographics. Participants indicated patient care as the most meaningful aspect of work, whereas the highest contributors to burnout were workload and electronic health record documentation. Importantly, most respondents were unaware of available resources for burnout. Conclusions: Health care specialty societies have access to each level of the health system, creating an opportunity to monitor trends, disseminate resources, and influence the direction of efforts to reduce workplace stress and enhance clinician well-being.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 166
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, STAFF ACUT CRIT CAR
  • [2] American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, 2019, COMM EXC NURS
  • [3] American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, HLTH WORK ENV
  • [4] American Hospital Association, 2019, FAST FACTS US TAL 20
  • [5] American Medical Association, 2018, PROF WELL BEING
  • [6] American Nurses Association, HLTH NURS HLTH NAT G
  • [7] American Thoracic Society, 2018, MEMB
  • [8] American Thoracic Society, ATS WELLN
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2019, Taking Action Against Clinician Burnout: A Systems Approach to Professional Well-Being [Internet], DOI DOI 10.17226/25521
  • [10] Nurse staffing, burnout, and health care-associated infection
    Cimiotti, Jeannie P.
    Aiken, Linda H.
    Sloane, Douglas M.
    Wu, Evan S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2012, 40 (06) : 486 - 490