Technological advances in suspended-sediment surrogate monitoring

被引:109
作者
Gray, John R. [1 ]
Gartner, Jeffrey W. [2 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Off Surface Water, Reston, VA 20192 USA
[2] US Geol Survey, Tucson, AZ 85719 USA
关键词
DOPPLER-CURRENT-PROFILER; OPTICAL BACKSCATTERANCE SENSOR; ACOUSTIC BACKSCATTER; PARTICLE-SIZE; ZOOPLANKTON ABUNDANCE; LABORATORY EVALUATION; SAND; ENVIRONMENT; INSTRUMENT; SUSPENSION;
D O I
10.1029/2008WR007063
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Surrogate technologies to continuously monitor suspended sediment show promise toward supplanting traditional data collection methods requiring routine collection and analysis of water samples. Commercially available instruments operating on bulk optic (turbidity), laser optic, pressure difference, and acoustic backscatter principles are evaluated based on cost, reliability, robustness, accuracy, sample volume, susceptibility to biological fouling, and suitable range of mass concentration and particle size distribution. In situ turbidimeters are widely used. They provide reliable data where the point measurements can be reliably correlated to the river's mean cross section concentration value, effects of biological fouling can be minimized, and concentrations remain below the sensor's upper measurement limit. In situ laser diffraction instruments have similar limitations and can cost 6 times the approximate $5000 purchase price of a turbidimeter. However, laser diffraction instruments provide volumetric-concentration data in 32 size classes. Pressure differential instruments measure mass density in a water column, thus integrating substantially more streamflow than a point measurement. They are designed for monitoring medium-to-large concentrations, are generally unaffected by biological fouling, and cost about the same as a turbidimeter. However, their performance has been marginal in field applications. Acoustic Doppler profilers use acoustic backscatter to measure suspended sediment concentrations in orders of magnitude more streamflow than do instruments that rely on point measurements. The technology is relatively robust and generally immune to effects of biological fouling. Cost of a single-frequency device is about double that of a turbidimeter. Multifrequency arrays also provide the potential to resolve concentrations by clay silt versus sand size fractions. Multifrequency hydroacoustics shows the most promise for revolutionizing collection of continuous suspended sediment data by instruments that require only periodic calibration for correlation to mean concentrations in river cross sections. Broad application of proven suspended sediment surrogate technologies has the potential to revolutionize fluvial sediment monitoring. Once applied, benefits could be enormous, providing for safer, more frequent and consistent, arguably more accurate, and ultimately less expensive sediment data for managing the world's sedimentary resources.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The influence of catchment characteristics on suspended sediment properties
    Ankers, C
    Walling, DE
    Smith, RP
    HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2003, 494 (1-3) : 159 - 167
  • [42] Sediment diffusion coefficient model for predicting the vertical distribution of suspended sediment concentration in uniform open-channel flows
    Terfous, Abdelali
    Sabat, Mira
    Ghenaim, Abdellah
    ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2020, 13 (21)
  • [43] Influence of infiltration on suspended sediment under waves
    Obhrai, C
    Nielsen, P
    Vincent, CE
    COASTAL ENGINEERING, 2002, 45 (02) : 111 - 123
  • [44] Acoustic based assessment of cross-sectional concentration inhomogeneity at a suspended sediment monitoring station in a large river
    Flóra Pomázi
    Sándor Baranya
    Acta Geophysica, 2022, 70 : 2361 - 2377
  • [45] Quantified turbulent diffusion of suspended sediment using acoustic Doppler current profilers
    Sassi, M. G.
    F. Hoitink, A. J.
    Vermeulen, B.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2013, 40 (21) : 5692 - 5697
  • [46] Effects of Bed Load and Suspended Load on Separation of Sands and Fines in Mixed Sediment
    Jepsen, Richard
    Roberts, Jesse
    Gailani, Joseph
    JOURNAL OF WATERWAY PORT COASTAL AND OCEAN ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2010, 136 (06): : 319 - 326
  • [47] Suspended sediment transport around a large-scale laboratory breaker bar
    van der Zanden, J.
    van der A, D. A.
    Hurther, D.
    Caceres, I.
    O'Donoghue, T.
    Ribberink, J. S.
    COASTAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 125 : 51 - 69
  • [48] An evaluation of the use of a multibeam echo-sounder for observations crossMark of suspended sediment
    Simmons, Stephen M.
    Parsons, Daniel R.
    Best, James L.
    Oberg, Kevin A.
    Czuba, Jonathan A.
    Keevil, Gareth M.
    APPLIED ACOUSTICS, 2017, 126 : 81 - 90
  • [49] Estimating instantaneous concentration of suspended sediment using acoustic backscatter from an ADV
    Li, Wenjie
    Yang, Shengfa
    Yang, Wei
    Xiao, Yi
    Fu, Xuhui
    Zhang, Shuaishuai
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SEDIMENT RESEARCH, 2019, 34 (05) : 422 - 431
  • [50] Effects of suspended sediment concentration and grain size on three optical turbidity sensors
    Merten, Gustavo Henrique
    Capel, Paul D.
    Minella, Jean P. G.
    JOURNAL OF SOILS AND SEDIMENTS, 2014, 14 (07) : 1235 - 1241