Technological advances in suspended-sediment surrogate monitoring

被引:109
|
作者
Gray, John R. [1 ]
Gartner, Jeffrey W. [2 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Off Surface Water, Reston, VA 20192 USA
[2] US Geol Survey, Tucson, AZ 85719 USA
关键词
DOPPLER-CURRENT-PROFILER; OPTICAL BACKSCATTERANCE SENSOR; ACOUSTIC BACKSCATTER; PARTICLE-SIZE; ZOOPLANKTON ABUNDANCE; LABORATORY EVALUATION; SAND; ENVIRONMENT; INSTRUMENT; SUSPENSION;
D O I
10.1029/2008WR007063
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Surrogate technologies to continuously monitor suspended sediment show promise toward supplanting traditional data collection methods requiring routine collection and analysis of water samples. Commercially available instruments operating on bulk optic (turbidity), laser optic, pressure difference, and acoustic backscatter principles are evaluated based on cost, reliability, robustness, accuracy, sample volume, susceptibility to biological fouling, and suitable range of mass concentration and particle size distribution. In situ turbidimeters are widely used. They provide reliable data where the point measurements can be reliably correlated to the river's mean cross section concentration value, effects of biological fouling can be minimized, and concentrations remain below the sensor's upper measurement limit. In situ laser diffraction instruments have similar limitations and can cost 6 times the approximate $5000 purchase price of a turbidimeter. However, laser diffraction instruments provide volumetric-concentration data in 32 size classes. Pressure differential instruments measure mass density in a water column, thus integrating substantially more streamflow than a point measurement. They are designed for monitoring medium-to-large concentrations, are generally unaffected by biological fouling, and cost about the same as a turbidimeter. However, their performance has been marginal in field applications. Acoustic Doppler profilers use acoustic backscatter to measure suspended sediment concentrations in orders of magnitude more streamflow than do instruments that rely on point measurements. The technology is relatively robust and generally immune to effects of biological fouling. Cost of a single-frequency device is about double that of a turbidimeter. Multifrequency arrays also provide the potential to resolve concentrations by clay silt versus sand size fractions. Multifrequency hydroacoustics shows the most promise for revolutionizing collection of continuous suspended sediment data by instruments that require only periodic calibration for correlation to mean concentrations in river cross sections. Broad application of proven suspended sediment surrogate technologies has the potential to revolutionize fluvial sediment monitoring. Once applied, benefits could be enormous, providing for safer, more frequent and consistent, arguably more accurate, and ultimately less expensive sediment data for managing the world's sedimentary resources.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Estimating sand concentrations using ADCP-based acoustic inversion in a large fluvial system characterized by bi-modal suspended-sediment distributions
    Szupiany, Ricardo N.
    Lopez Weibel, Cecilia
    Guerrero, Massimo
    Latosinski, Francisco
    Wood, Molly
    Dominguez Ruben, Lucas
    Oberg, Kevin
    EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 2019, 44 (06) : 1295 - 1308
  • [22] Hydrological and instrumentation aspects of monitoring and analysing suspended sediment transport crossing international borders
    Schindl, G.
    Studnicka, M.
    Eckelhart, A.
    Summer, W.
    SEDIMENT BUDGETS 1, 2005, 291 : 227 - 240
  • [23] Suspended sediment monitoring in alluvial gullies: A laboratory and field evaluation of available measurement techniques
    Doriean, Nicholas J. C.
    Brooks, Andrew P.
    Teasdale, Peter R.
    Welsh, David T.
    Bennett, William W.
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2020, 34 (16) : 3426 - 3438
  • [24] Sediment Size Effects in Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter-Derived Estimates of Suspended Sediment Concentration
    Ozturk, Mehmet
    WATER, 2017, 9 (07):
  • [25] Near bed suspended sediment flux by single turbulent events
    Amirshahi, Seyed Mohammad
    Kwoll, Eva
    Winter, Christian
    CONTINENTAL SHELF RESEARCH, 2018, 152 : 76 - 86
  • [26] Study of Suspended Sediment Diffusion Coefficients in Submerged Vegetation Flow
    Li, Da
    Yang, Zhonghua
    Guo, Man
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2022, 58 (03)
  • [27] Using velocimeter signal to noise ratio as a surrogate measure of suspended mud concentration
    Salehi, Mehrdad
    Strom, Kyle
    CONTINENTAL SHELF RESEARCH, 2011, 31 (09) : 1020 - 1032
  • [28] Estimation of suspended sediment concentration by acoustic equations for soil sediment
    Meral, Ramazan
    Smerdon, Andy
    Merdun, Hasan
    Demirkiran, Ali Riza
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2010, 9 (02): : 171 - 178
  • [29] Acoustic measuring techniques for suspended sediment
    Gruber, P.
    Felix, D.
    Storti, G.
    Lattuada, M.
    Fleckenstein, P.
    Deschwanden, F.
    28TH IAHR SYMPOSIUM ON HYDRAULIC MACHINERY AND SYSTEMS (IAHR2016), PTS 1-12, 2016, 49
  • [30] Phosphorus sorption to suspended sediment in freshwater
    Tang, Hongwu
    Zhao, Hanqing
    Li, Zhiwei
    Yuan, Saiyu
    Li, Qingxia
    Ji, Fei
    Xiao, Yang
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-WATER MANAGEMENT, 2017, 170 (05) : 231 - 242