The Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters (MAGIC): Results From a Multispecialty Panel Using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method

被引:380
作者
Chopra, Vineet [1 ]
Flanders, Scott A.
Saint, Sanjay
Woller, Scott C.
O'Grady, Naomi P.
Safdar, Nasia
Trerotola, Scott O.
Saran, Rajiv
Moureau, Nancy
Wiseman, Stephen
Pittiruti, Mauro
Akl, Elie A.
Lee, Agnes Y.
Courey, Anthony
Swaminathan, Lakshmi
LeDonne, Jack
Becker, Carol
Krein, Sarah L.
Bernstein, Steven J.
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Inst Healthcare Policy & Innovat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
INSERTED CENTRAL CATHETERS; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERS; BLOOD-STREAM INFECTION; DEEP-VEIN THROMBOSIS; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; HOME PARENTERAL-NUTRITION; RISK-FACTORS; UPPER-EXTREMITY; CANCER-PATIENTS; RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS;
D O I
10.7326/M15-0744
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Use of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) has grown substantially in recent years. Increasing use has led to the realization that PICCs are associated with important complications, including thrombosis and infection. Moreover, some PICCs may not be placed for clinically valid reasons. Defining appropriate indications for insertion, maintenance, and care of PICCs is thus important for patient safety. An international panel was convened that applied the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method to develop criteria for use of PICCs. After systematic reviews of the literature, scenarios related to PICC use, care, and maintenance were developed according to patient population (for example, general hospitalized, critically ill, cancer, kidney disease), indication for insertion (infusion of peripherally compatible infusates vs. vesicants), and duration of use (<= 5 days, 6 to 14 days, 15 to 30 days, or >= 31 days). Within each scenario, appropriateness of PICC use was compared with that of other venous access devices. After review of 665 scenarios, 253 (38%) were rated as appropriate, 124 (19%) as neutral/uncertain, and 288 (43%) as inappropriate. For peripherally compatible infusions, PICC use was rated as inappropriate when the proposed duration of use was 5 or fewer days. Midline catheters and ultrasonography-guided peripheral intravenous catheters were preferred to PICCs for use between 6 and 14 days. In critically ill patients, nontunneled central venous catheters were preferred over PICCs when 14 or fewer days of use were likely. In patients with cancer, PICCs were rated as appropriate for irritant or vesicant infusion, regardless of duration. The panel of experts used a validated method to develop appropriate indications for PICC use across patient populations. These criteria can be used to improve care, inform quality improvement efforts, and advance the safety of medical patients.
引用
收藏
页码:S1 / +
页数:48
相关论文
共 245 条
[1]   Incidence of upper limb venous thrombosis associated with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) [J].
Abdullah, JJ ;
Mohammad, N ;
Sangkar, JV ;
Aziz, YFA ;
Gan, GG ;
Goh, KY ;
Benedict, I .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2005, 78 (931) :596-600
[2]   Upper Extremity Venous Thrombosis in Patients With Cancer With Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters: A Retrospective Analysis of Risk Factors [J].
Ahn, Daniel H. ;
Illum, Henrik Bo ;
Wang, David H. ;
Sharma, Anant ;
Dowell, Jonathan E. .
JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2013, 9 (01) :E8-E12
[3]  
Akers Adam S, 2009, J Hosp Med, V4, pE1, DOI 10.1002/jhm.446
[4]  
AKL EA, 2011, COCHRANE DATABASE
[5]   Peripherally inserted central venous catheters in the acute care setting: A safe alternative to high-risk short-term central venous catheters [J].
Al Raiy, Basel ;
Fakih, Mohamad G. ;
Bryan-Nomides, Nicole ;
Hopfner, Debi ;
Riegel, Elizabeth ;
Nenninger, Trudy ;
Rey, Janice ;
Szpunar, Susan ;
Kale, Pramodine ;
Khatib, Riad .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2010, 38 (02) :149-153
[6]   Peripherally inserted central catheter bloodstream infection surveillance rates in an acute care setting in Saudi Arabia [J].
Al-Tawfiq, Jaffar A. ;
Abed, Mahmoud S. ;
Memish, Ziad A. .
ANNALS OF SAUDI MEDICINE, 2012, 32 (02) :169-173
[7]   Central Venous Catheter Placement by Advanced Practice Nurses Demonstrates Low Procedural Complication and Infection Rates-A Report From 13 Years of Service [J].
Alexandrou, Evan ;
Spencer, Timothy R. ;
Frost, Steven A. ;
Mifflin, Nicholas ;
Davidson, Patricia M. ;
Hillman, Ken M. .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2014, 42 (03) :536-543
[8]  
Alhimyary A, 1996, Nutr Clin Pract, V11, P199, DOI 10.1177/0115426596011005199
[9]  
Alkindi Salam, 2012, J Infect Public Health, V5, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.jiph.2011.10.004
[10]   An In Vivo Rabbit Model for the Evaluation of Antimicrobial Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter to Reduce Microbial Migration and Colonization as Compared to an Uncoated PICC [J].
Allan, Nicholas D. ;
Giare-Patel, Kamna ;
Olson, Merle E. .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICINE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2012,