Centrifuge modelling of heating effects on energy pile performance in saturated sand

被引:134
作者
Ng, C. W. W. [1 ]
Shi, C. [1 ]
Gunawan, A. [1 ]
Laloui, L. [2 ]
Liu, H. L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne, Swiss Fed Inst Technol, LMS, Lab Soil Mech, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
[3] Chongqing Univ, Coll Civil & Environm Engn, Chongqing 630044, Peoples R China
关键词
energy pile; capacity; centrifuge modelling; heave; MECHANICAL-BEHAVIOR; FOUNDATIONS; EXPANSION;
D O I
10.1139/cgj-2014-0301
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The operation of energy piles in summer can expel excess heat of the buildings into the ground by the use of a heat pump. Despite having been implemented for decades, the design of energy piles still relies heavily on empiricism, as there is limited understanding about heating effects on pile capacity. A series of centrifuge model tests on aluminum energy piles in medium dense saturated sand is reported in this study to investigate heating effects on the settlement patterns as well as capacities of single piles. In total, four in-flight pile load tests under three different temperatures, namely 22, 37, and 52 degrees C, and different loading sequences were carried out. Variations of pile capacity were interpreted with the help of a nonlinear elastic analysis. The test results show that after heating at zero applied axial load, toe resistance of the pile was mobilized as a result of constrained downward thermal expansion of the pile. Heating to a higher temperature caused the neutral plane to shift towards the pile toe due to a larger degree of mobilization of end-bearing resistance. It is also found that for a pile under a maintained working load, the pile head heaved initially by 1.4%D (D, pile diameter) when the temperature increased by 30 degrees C, but it gradually settled to 0.8% D after 4 months of continuous heating at the constant temperature. The post-pile settlement is believed to be caused by thermal contraction of sand. Subsequent pile load tests show that pile capacities increased by 13% and 30% with incremental temperatures of 15 and 30 degrees C, respectively. With an increasing temperature, shaft resistance increased but at a reducing rate. At a higher elevated temperature, toe resistance increased more rapidly than shaft resistance due to a larger downward expansion of the pile. For simplicity, earth pressure coefficients with values of 1.1K(0) and 1.3K(0) were found to be suitable for estimating the capacities of aluminum model piles with temperature increments of 15 and 30 degrees C, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:1045 / 1057
页数:13
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   THERMAL-EXPANSION AND PORE PRESSURE GENERATION IN OIL SANDS [J].
AGAR, JG ;
MORGENSTERN, NR ;
SCOTT, JD .
CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 1986, 23 (03) :327-333
[2]   Thermo-mechanical behaviour of energy piles [J].
Amatya, B. L. ;
Soga, K. ;
Bourne-Webb, P. J. ;
Amis, T. ;
Laloui, L. .
GEOTECHNIQUE, 2012, 62 (06) :503-519
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Geotechnical Design - Part 1: General Rules
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, STANDARD TEST METHOD
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1986, Conduction of Heat in Solids
[6]   Energy pile test at Lambeth College, London: geotechnical and thermodynamic aspects of pile response to heat cycles [J].
Bourne-Webb, P. J. ;
Amatya, B. ;
Soga, K. ;
Amis, T. ;
Davidson, C. ;
Payne, P. .
GEOTECHNIQUE, 2009, 59 (03) :237-248
[7]   Energy foundations and other thermo-active ground structures [J].
Brandl, H .
GEOTECHNIQUE, 2006, 56 (02) :81-122
[8]   Experimental study of thermal effects on the mechanical behaviour of a clay [J].
Cekerevac, C ;
Laloui, L .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL AND ANALYTICAL METHODS IN GEOMECHANICS, 2004, 28 (03) :209-228
[9]  
Coyle H.M., 1966, J SOIL MECH FDN DIVI, V92, P1
[10]   Technological advances and applications of geothermal energy pile foundations and their feasibility in Australia [J].
de Moel, Monique ;
Bach, Peter M. ;
Bouazza, Abdelmalek ;
Singh, Rao M. ;
Sun, JingLiang O. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2010, 14 (09) :2683-2696