Patterns of treatment and BRAF testing with immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in patients with metastatic melanoma presumed to be BRAF positive

被引:5
|
作者
Ghate, Sameer [1 ]
Ionescu-Ittu, Raluca [3 ]
Burne, Rebecca [3 ]
Ndife, Briana [1 ]
Laliberte, Francois [3 ]
Nakasato, Antonio [1 ]
Duh, Mei Sheng [2 ]
机构
[1] Novartis Pharmaceut, E Hanover, NJ USA
[2] Anal Grp Inc, 111 Huntington Ave,14th Floor, Boston, MA 02199 USA
[3] Grp Anal Ltee, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
BRAF testing; immune checkpoint inhibitors; metastatic melanoma; targeted therapy; OPEN-LABEL; SYSTEMIC THERAPY; COMBINED NIVOLUMAB; IMPROVED SURVIVAL; POOLED ANALYSIS; IPILIMUMAB; DABRAFENIB; MULTICENTER; VEMURAFENIB; MUTATION;
D O I
10.1097/CMR.0000000000000504
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Patients with BRAF V600 (BRAF) mutated metastatic melanoma are eligible for therapy with both immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies, making treatment choice a complex decision. The present study aimed to describe patterns of treatment with immunotherapy and targeted therapy and BRAF testing in patients with metastatic melanoma presumed to have BRAF mutations (BRAF+) in the years following the approval of the newer generation of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies (2014-2016). Two large US commercial claims databases [Truven Health Analytics MarketScan and IQVIA Real-World Data Adjudicated Claims - USA (IQVIA RWD Adjudicated Claims - USA)] were used. Patients were presumed BRAF+ if they received at least 2 lines of therapy of which at least 1 included targeted therapy. Sequence of lines of therapy and regimens used in first (1L), second (2L), and third (3L), as well as timing of BRAF testing by sequence of therapy were described. In the Truven sample (n= 162), targeted therapy was used by 66% in 1L and by 54% in 2L, and 62% had a BRAF test; in the IQVIA RWD Adjudicated Claims - USA sample (n= 247), targeted therapy was used by 62% in 1L and by 50% in 2L, and 68% had a BRAF test. Among those with a claim for a BRAF test prior to 1L, over two-thirds were initiated on targeted therapy. These findings suggest that the rate of BRAF testing remained low in the years following the approval of BRAF-targeted regimens for metastatic disease. Given the recently approved adjuvant treatment options for stage III melanoma, improving the rates of BRAF testing becomes increasingly important. Copyright (c) 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 310
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Rationale for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Plus Targeted Therapy in Metastatic Melanoma A Review
    Dummer, Reinhard
    Ascierto, Paolo A.
    Nathan, Paul
    Robert, Caroline
    Schadendorf, Dirk
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2020, 6 (12) : 1957 - 1966
  • [42] Cautious addition of targeted therapy to PD-1 inhibitors after initial progression of BRAF mutant metastatic melanoma on checkpoint inhibitor therapy
    Wolfram Samlowski
    Camille Adajar
    BMC Cancer, 21
  • [43] Sequencing of BRAF inhibitors and ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma: a possible algorithm for clinical use
    Paolo A Ascierto
    Ester Simeone
    Diana Giannarelli
    Antonio M Grimaldi
    Anna Romano
    Nicola Mozzillo
    Journal of Translational Medicine, 10
  • [44] Sequencing of BRAF inhibitors and ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma: a possible algorithm for clinical use
    Ascierto, Paolo A.
    Simeone, Ester
    Giannarelli, Diana
    Grimaldi, Antonio M.
    Romano, Anna
    Mozzillo, Nicola
    JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2012, 10
  • [45] Targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of metastatic melanoma patients: a guide and update for pathologists
    Kakavand, Hojabr
    Wilmott, James S.
    Long, Georgina V.
    Scolyer, Richard A.
    PATHOLOGY, 2016, 48 (02) : 194 - 202
  • [46] Treatment reality of patients with BRAF-mutant advanced/metastatic melanoma in Switzerland in the era of choice
    Mangana, Joanna
    Zihler, Deborah
    Bossart, Simon
    Broennimann, Daniel
    Zachariah, Ralph
    Gerard, Camille Lea
    MELANOMA RESEARCH, 2022, 32 (05) : 366 - 372
  • [47] Switch to checkpoint inhibition after targeted therapy at time of progression or during ongoing response: A retrospective single-centre experience in patients with BRAF-mutated melanoma
    Reijers, Irene L. M.
    Rozeman, Elisa A.
    Wilgenhof, Sofie
    van Thienen, Johannes V.
    Haanen, John B. A. G.
    Blank, Christian U.
    PIGMENT CELL & MELANOMA RESEARCH, 2020, 33 (03) : 498 - 506
  • [48] Treatment Sequencing and Clinical Outcomes in BRAF-Positive and BRAF-Negative Unresectable and Metastatic Melanoma Patients Treated with New Systemic Therapies in Routine Practice
    Czarnecka, Anna M.
    Teterycz, Pawel
    Mariuk-Jarema, Anna
    Lugowska, Iwona
    Rogala, Pawel
    Dudzisz-Sledz, Monika
    Switaj, Tomasz
    Rutkowski, Piotr
    TARGETED ONCOLOGY, 2019, 14 (06) : 729 - 742
  • [49] Correlation between previous treatment with BRAF inhibitors and clinical response to pembrolizumab in patients with advanced melanoma
    Simeone, Ester
    Grimaldi, Antonio Maria
    Festino, Lucia
    Giannarelli, Diana
    Vanella, Vito
    Palla, Marco
    Curvietto, Marcello
    Esposito, Assunta
    Palmieri, Giuseppe
    Mozzillo, Nicola
    Ascierto, Paolo Antonio
    ONCOIMMUNOLOGY, 2017, 6 (03):
  • [50] Immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies for metastatic melanoma: A network meta-analysis
    Pasquali, Sandro
    Chiarion-Sileni, Vanna
    Rossi, Carlo Riccardo
    Mocellin, Simone
    CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2017, 54 : 34 - 42