Telehealth research and evaluation: Implications for decision makers

被引:2
|
作者
Fitzmaurice, JM [1 ]
机构
[1] US Dept HHS, Agcy Hlth Care Policy & Res, Rockville, MD 20852 USA
来源
PACIFIC MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY SYMPOSIUM, PROCEEDINGS | 1998年
关键词
D O I
10.1109/PACMED.1998.769954
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Society must answer questions about health information technology applications, or telehealth, that lead to the best allocation of resources for maintaining and improving the health status of our population. These questions deal with the adoption and deployment of telehealth for improving the health and well-being of the members of society, compared with alternative means. From the less than overwhelming response to the "build it and they will come approach, we clearly have insufficient evidence of the medical effectiveness, cost effectiveness, and patient :and provider satisfaction with telehealth solutions. The Agency for Health Ch-re policy and Research (AHCPR) I is a federal research agency that supports research to find out what is effective in improving the quality; of and access to heath services in the community, what is the impact on patient outcomes, and what is the cost of obtaining those outcomes. Telehealth decision makers need studies of telehealth technologies that focus on specific clinical conditions in narrowly concentrated applications and that use scientific methods to compare outcomes and treatment costs for patients and physicians who do and those who do not receive telehealth services under controlled circumstances. AHCPR-funded studies are presented as examples of methods of scientific investigation into the use and acceptance of computerized decision support and telehealth services.
引用
收藏
页码:344 / 352
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Shared Decision Making in the Era of Telehealth: Implications for Practice and Research
    Ozanne, Elissa M.
    Noseworthy, Peter A.
    Cameron, Kenzie A.
    Schmidt, Monika
    Cavanaugh, Kerri
    Pershing, Mandy L.
    Guzman, Adriana
    Sivly, Angela
    Fagerlin, Angela
    MDM POLICY & PRACTICE, 2020, 5 (02)
  • [2] RESEARCH ON THE CONFINEMENT AND TREATMENT OF UNFIT DEFENDANTS - IMPLICATIONS FOR DECISION MAKERS
    ROESCH, R
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE CRIMINOLOGIE, 1981, 23 (04): : 451 - 458
  • [3] The Implications of the Rationality of Decision-Makers on the Utilization of Evaluation Findings
    Hyyrylainen, Esa
    Viinamaki, Olli-Pekka
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2008, 31 (10-11) : 1223 - 1240
  • [4] The International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research: Implications for Decision Makers in Healthcare
    Cummins, Gordon M.
    AMERICAN HEALTH AND DRUG BENEFITS, 2008, 1 (06): : 43 - 44
  • [5] Decision makers competence evaluation
    Orlic, R
    Becejski-Vujaklija, D
    WORLD MULTICONFERENCE ON SYSTEMICS, CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATICS, VOL XVII, PROCEEDINGS: CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATICS: CONCEPTS AND APPLICATIONS (PT II), 2001, : 114 - 118
  • [6] EVALUATION AND USE OF MARKETING-RESEARCH BY DECISION MAKERS - A BEHAVIORAL SIMULATION
    LEE, H
    ACITO, F
    DAY, RL
    JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1987, 24 (02) : 187 - 196
  • [7] Balancing research and service to decision makers
    Littell, Jeremy S.
    Terando, Adam J.
    Morelli, Toni Lyn
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 15 (10) : 598 - 598
  • [8] RESEARCH UTILIZATION - REACHING DECISION MAKERS
    EISELE, FR
    GAMM, L
    CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 1981, 3 (04) : 291 - 303
  • [9] Information and research for decision-makers
    Emmanuel, SC
    WORLD HEALTH FORUM, 1998, 19 (01): : 12 - 14
  • [10] INFORMATION EVALUATION AND DECISION MAKERS OBJECTIVES
    AHITUV, N
    WAND, Y
    INTERFACES, 1981, 11 (03) : 24 - 33