Enhancing static-load-test identification of bridges using dynamic data

被引:26
作者
Cao, Wen-Jun [1 ,2 ]
Koh, Chan Ghee [1 ]
Smith, I. F. C. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Singapore 117576, Singapore
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Future Cities Lab, Singapore ETH Ctr, Singapore 138602, Singapore
[3] Swiss Fed Inst Technol EPFL, Sch Architecture Civil & Environm Engn ENAC, Appl Comp & Mech Lab IMAC, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
System identification; Parameter estimation; Multi-response; Finite element method; Static measurements; Dynamic measurements; STRUCTURAL IDENTIFICATION; MODEL; DAMAGE; UNCERTAINTY; STRATEGY; FRAMEWORK; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.02.041
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In situ measurements have the potential to provide valuable information about the safety and the condition of bridges through implementation of system-identification methodology. A significant amount of research has focused on system identification using either dynamic or static measurements separately. Realizing the complementary relationship between static and dynamic measurements, traditional model updating methods adopt error functions to account for the residual between modeling and measured values for various types of measurements. Behavioral models may be inaccurate due to incomplete representation of modeling and measurement uncertainties. Furthermore, the normalization of error functions may bring additional uncertainty to the identification process. In this paper, an approach based on the model falsification method is proposed to combine both static and dynamic measurements with explicit consideration of both modeling and measurement uncertainties. A measurement selection strategy is also used to help detect abnormal measurements. The approach has been evaluated using a highway flyover bridge in Singapore. Dynamic measurement data include natural frequencies and mode shapes whereas static measurement data include inclinations, deflections and strains. By combining both static and dynamic measurements, this approach leads to falsification of additional model instances and obtains a more precise prediction of parameter values than approaches which interpret static measurements only.
引用
收藏
页码:410 / 420
页数:11
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Aggarwal C.C., 2015, Data mining, VVolume 1, P75
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, LOGIC SCI DISCOVERY, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203994627
[3]  
ANSYS IC, 2016, US MAN 17 0
[4]   Updating models and their uncertainties. I: Bayesian statistical framework [J].
Beck, JL ;
Katafygiotis, LS .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 1998, 124 (04) :455-461
[5]   Assessment of Highway Bridge Upgrading by Dynamic Testing and Finite-Element Model Updating [J].
Brownjohn, James Mark William ;
Moyo, Pilate ;
Omenzetter, Piotr ;
Lu, Yong .
JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2003, 8 (03) :162-172
[6]   Calculation of Posterior Probabilities for Bayesian Model Class Assessment and Averaging from Posterior Samples Based on Dynamic System Data [J].
Cheung, Sai Hung ;
Beck, James L. .
COMPUTER-AIDED CIVIL AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2010, 25 (05) :304-321
[7]   Dynamic identification of a masonry building using forced vibration tests [J].
De Sortis, A ;
Antonacci, E ;
Vestroni, F .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2005, 27 (02) :155-165
[8]   Ambient vibration testing and structural evaluation of an historic suspension footbridge [J].
Gentile, C. ;
Gallino, N. .
ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE, 2008, 39 (04) :356-366
[9]   Evidence-Based Identification of Weighting Factors in Bayesian Model Updating Using Modal Data [J].
Goller, B. ;
Beck, J. L. ;
Schueller, G. I. .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE, 2012, 138 (05) :430-440
[10]   Investigation of model uncertainties in Bayesian structural model updating [J].
Goller, B. ;
Schueller, G. I. .
JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2011, 330 (25) :6122-6136