The stroke impact scale 3.0 - Evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity of the Brazilian version

被引:116
|
作者
Carod-Artal, Francisco Javier [1 ]
Coral, Luciane Ferreira [1 ]
Trizotto, Daniele Stieven [1 ]
Moreira, Clarissa Menezes [1 ]
机构
[1] Sarah Hosp, Dept Neurol, Sarah Network Rehabil Hosp, BR-70330150 Brasilia, DF, Brazil
关键词
health-related quality of life; reliability; stroke; Stroke Impact Scale; validity;
D O I
10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.513671
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose-We sought to assess the psychometric attributes of the Brazilian version of the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) 3.0 in stroke survivors. Methods-Patients were evaluated by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, Mini-Mental State Examination, Barthel Index, Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale, modified Rankin Scale, Geriatric Depression Scale, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Health-related quality of life was evaluated with the MOS-Short Form 36 and SIS 3.0. Results-One hundred seventy-four stroke survivors were assessed (mean age, 56.9 years; 55.2% male). Hand function had a prominent floor effect (45.9%), whereas a ceiling effect was observed in the communication domain (17.3%). The internal consistency of SIS (Cronbach's alpha = 0.94) and SIS domains (item-dimension correlation, 0.17 to 0.89) were satisfactory; only the emotion domain had poor internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.49). Test-retest reliability was evaluated in 50 consecutive patients. Concerning the stability of the SIS, the weighted kappa values ranged from 0.33 (item 3a) to 0.94 (item 7e). Intraclass correlation coefficient values for the SIS domains ranged from 0.48 (emotion) to 0.94 (hand function). Standard error of measurement values for SIS domains ranged from 6.85 (mobility) to 9.63 (social participation). Regarding convergent validity, a significant correlation (Spearman's correlation coefficient, P < 0.0001) was found between the SIS composite physical domain and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (-0.69), modified Rankin Scale (-0.81), Barthel Index (0.87), Lawton Scale (0.76), and MOS-Short Form 36 physical component summary (0.61). SIS domain scores significantly decreased as modified Rankin Scale scores increased (discriminative validity; ANOVA, P < 0.0001). Conclusions-The Brazilian version of SIS 3.0 has satisfactory psychometric properties and can be used in stroke survivors to assess health- related quality of life.
引用
收藏
页码:2477 / 2484
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale: Psychometric Evaluation
    Lee, Jisan
    Schnall, Rebecca
    JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2022, 10 (01)
  • [42] Stroke and aphasia quality of life scale-39 (SAQOL-39) - Evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity
    Hilari, K
    Byng, S
    Lamping, DL
    Smith, SC
    STROKE, 2003, 34 (08) : 1944 - 1950
  • [43] The Chinese version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ (PedsQL™) 3.0 Asthma Module: reliability and validity
    Feng, Lifen
    Zhang, Yingfen
    Chen, Ruoqing
    Hao, Yuantao
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2011, 9
  • [44] The Chinese version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ (PedsQL™) 3.0 Asthma Module: reliability and validity
    Lifen Feng
    Yingfen Zhang
    Ruoqing Chen
    Yuantao Hao
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 9
  • [45] Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the COVID-19-Impact on Quality of Life Scale
    Okten, Cigdem
    Yazici, Havva Gezgin
    GALICIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 29 (02)
  • [46] Validity and reliability of the Greek version of the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale in multiple sclerosis patients
    Bakalidou, Daphne
    Voumvourakis, Konstantinos
    Tsourti, Zoi
    Papageorgiou, Effie
    Poulios, Antonios
    Giannopoulos, Sotirios
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 2014, 37 (03) : 271 - 276
  • [47] Public Stigma of Stroke Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study
    Turan, Guelcan Bahcecioglu
    Ozer, Zuelfinaz
    Yildiz, Esra
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE, 2025, 31 (01)
  • [48] Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Burden Assessment Scale
    Aydemir, Omer
    Dikici, Didem Suculluoglu
    Akdeniz, Fatma
    Kalayci, Fatma
    NOROPSIKIYATRI ARSIVI-ARCHIVES OF NEUROPSYCHIATRY, 2012, 49 (04): : 276 - 280
  • [49] The Validity and Reliability of The Turkish Version of The Social Curiosity Scale
    Karakullukcu, Serdar
    Karakullukcu, Erdinc
    Bal, Betul
    Kazak, Aysun
    Karakullukcu, Ayse
    ISTANBUL UNIVERSITESI SOSYOLOJI DERGISI-ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2022, 42 (03): : 133 - 151
  • [50] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Recovery Assessment Scale
    Guler, Cansu
    Gurkan, Ayca
    DUSUNEN ADAM-JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 32 (04): : 309 - 319