The stroke impact scale 3.0 - Evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity of the Brazilian version

被引:116
|
作者
Carod-Artal, Francisco Javier [1 ]
Coral, Luciane Ferreira [1 ]
Trizotto, Daniele Stieven [1 ]
Moreira, Clarissa Menezes [1 ]
机构
[1] Sarah Hosp, Dept Neurol, Sarah Network Rehabil Hosp, BR-70330150 Brasilia, DF, Brazil
关键词
health-related quality of life; reliability; stroke; Stroke Impact Scale; validity;
D O I
10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.513671
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose-We sought to assess the psychometric attributes of the Brazilian version of the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) 3.0 in stroke survivors. Methods-Patients were evaluated by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, Mini-Mental State Examination, Barthel Index, Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale, modified Rankin Scale, Geriatric Depression Scale, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Health-related quality of life was evaluated with the MOS-Short Form 36 and SIS 3.0. Results-One hundred seventy-four stroke survivors were assessed (mean age, 56.9 years; 55.2% male). Hand function had a prominent floor effect (45.9%), whereas a ceiling effect was observed in the communication domain (17.3%). The internal consistency of SIS (Cronbach's alpha = 0.94) and SIS domains (item-dimension correlation, 0.17 to 0.89) were satisfactory; only the emotion domain had poor internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.49). Test-retest reliability was evaluated in 50 consecutive patients. Concerning the stability of the SIS, the weighted kappa values ranged from 0.33 (item 3a) to 0.94 (item 7e). Intraclass correlation coefficient values for the SIS domains ranged from 0.48 (emotion) to 0.94 (hand function). Standard error of measurement values for SIS domains ranged from 6.85 (mobility) to 9.63 (social participation). Regarding convergent validity, a significant correlation (Spearman's correlation coefficient, P < 0.0001) was found between the SIS composite physical domain and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (-0.69), modified Rankin Scale (-0.81), Barthel Index (0.87), Lawton Scale (0.76), and MOS-Short Form 36 physical component summary (0.61). SIS domain scores significantly decreased as modified Rankin Scale scores increased (discriminative validity; ANOVA, P < 0.0001). Conclusions-The Brazilian version of SIS 3.0 has satisfactory psychometric properties and can be used in stroke survivors to assess health- related quality of life.
引用
收藏
页码:2477 / 2484
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Stroke Impact Scale Version 3.0: Study of Reliability and Validity in Stroke Patients in the Turkish Population
    Hantal, Asli Ozmaden
    Dogu, Beril
    Buyukavci, Raikan
    Kuran, Banu
    TURKIYE FIZIKSEL TIP VE REHABILITASYON DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2014, 60 (02): : 106 - 116
  • [2] Reliability and Validity of the Nigerian (Hausa) Version of the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) 3.0 Index
    Mohammad, Ashiru Hamza
    Al-Sadat, Nabilla
    Yim, Loh Siew
    Chinna, Karuthan
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 2014
  • [3] The stroke impact scale version 2.0 - Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change
    Duncan, PW
    Wallace, D
    Lai, SM
    Johnson, D
    Embretson, S
    Laster, LJ
    STROKE, 1999, 30 (10) : 2131 - 2140
  • [4] Reliability and validity of the Portuguese version of the Stroke Impact Scale 2.0
    Goncalves, Rui S.
    Gil, Joao N.
    Cavalheiro, Luis
    Costa, Rui D.
    Ferreira, Pedro L.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2010, 19 : 118 - 119
  • [5] Korean Version of the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale: Reliability and Validity Evaluation
    Park, Mina
    Lee, Ji-Yeong
    Ham, Yeajin
    Oh, Sang-Wook
    Shin, Joon-Ho
    ANNALS OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE-ARM, 2020, 44 (01): : 11 - 19
  • [6] Reliability and validity of the Impact of Event Scale (IES): version for Brazilian burn victims
    Echevarria-Guanilo, Maria E.
    Dantas, Rosana A. S.
    Farina, Jayme A., Jr.
    Alonso, Jordi
    Rajmil, Luis
    Rossi, Lidia A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2011, 20 (11-12) : 1588 - 1597
  • [7] Reliability and validity of the Portuguese version of the Stroke Impact Scale 2.0 (SIS 2.0)
    Goncalves, Rui Soles
    Gil, Joao Neves
    Cavalheiro, Luis Manuel
    Costa, Rui Dias
    Ferreira, Pedro Lopes
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2012, 21 (04) : 691 - 696
  • [8] Reliability and validity of the Portuguese version of the Stroke Impact Scale 2.0 (SIS 2.0)
    Rui Soles Gonçalves
    João Neves Gil
    Luís Manuel Cavalheiro
    Rui Dias Costa
    Pedro Lopes Ferreira
    Quality of Life Research, 2012, 21 : 691 - 696
  • [9] Validation of questionnaire for evaluation of ischemic stroke sequels - the Czech version of Stroke Impact Scale 3.0
    Gurkova, Elena
    Sanak, Daniel
    Satekova, Lenka
    Sanakova, Sarka
    Zapletalova, Jana
    CESKA A SLOVENSKA NEUROLOGIE A NEUROCHIRURGIE, 2022, 85 (04) : 287 - 295
  • [10] Validity and Reliability of the Brazilian Version of the Weight Control Behaviors Scale
    Lenz Dunker, Karin Louise
    Claudino, Angelica Medeiros
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2017, 189 : 143 - +