Taxonomy of Industry 4.0 research: Mapping scholarship and industry insights

被引:30
作者
Nazarov, Dashi [1 ]
Klarin, Anton [2 ]
机构
[1] Queen Mary Univ, Sch Business & Management, London, England
[2] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Business & Law, 270 Joondalup Dr, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia
关键词
Fourth Industrial Revolution; Industry; 4; 0; science mapping; scientometrics; systematic review; CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEMS; BIG DATA; RESEARCH AGENDA; LEAN PRODUCTION; MATURITY MODEL; SUPPLY CHAIN; FUTURE; BLOCKCHAIN; AUTOMATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1002/sres.2700
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
A systems perspective of an emergent field such as Industry 4.0 requires combining and analysing the entire multidisciplinary scholarship under one map. Recent developments in scientometric analysis allow researchers to carry out complex bibliometric analyses coupled with an unstructured ontological discovery made available through thematic and ensuing semantic analyses to gain a holistic outlook on the ecosystem of Industry 4.0. The state-of-the-art review of the entire scholarship of Industry 4.0 demonstrates three broad clusters-the implications of automation on industry, the integration of technologies and technological advancements driving the Fourth Industrial Revolution. The scholarship output is, for the first time, compared with the leading industrial and policymaking institutional reports to highlight similarities and discrepancies. This allows to propose a previously unavailable definition of Industry 4.0, which is much needed to progress the research further. The three highly discrepant areas between academic literature and industry insights include lack of research into return on investment, lack of research involving policymaking, and the implications of technological development on the workforce, firms and countries. It is imperative to drive research into the existent, as well as the highlighted, themes in advancing the knowledge and aligning the academic scholarship with the interests of practitioners.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 556
页数:22
相关论文
共 154 条
[81]  
McKinsey & Company, 2015, IND 4 0 NAVIGATE DIG, DOI [10.1080/18811248.1966.9732270, DOI 10.1080/18811248.1966.9732270]
[82]  
McKinsey & Company, 2016, IND 4 0 INITIAL HYPE
[83]   The industrial management of SMEs in the era of Industry 4.0 [J].
Moeuf, Alexandre ;
Pellerin, Robert ;
Lamouri, Samir ;
Tamayo-Giraldo, Simon ;
Barbaray, Rodolphe .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2018, 56 (03) :1118-1136
[84]  
Mokyr J., 1998, Storia dell'economia Mondiale, P219
[85]   Cyber-physical systems in manufacturing [J].
Monostori, L. ;
Kadar, B. ;
Bauernhansl, T. ;
Kondoh, S. ;
Kumara, S. ;
Reinhart, G. ;
Sauer, O. ;
Schuh, G. ;
Sihn, W. ;
Ueda, K. .
CIRP ANNALS-MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 65 (02) :621-641
[86]   Cyber-physical production systems: Roots, expectations and R&D challenges [J].
Monostori, Laszlo .
VARIETY MANAGEMENT IN MANUFACTURING: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 47TH CIRP CONFERENCE ON MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2014, 17 :9-13
[87]   Industry 4.0 as a Cyber-Physical System study [J].
Mosterman, Pieter J. ;
Zander, Justyna .
SOFTWARE AND SYSTEMS MODELING, 2016, 15 (01) :17-29
[88]   Towards Lean Production in Industry 4.0 [J].
Mrugalska, Beata ;
Wyrwicka, Magdalena K. .
7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING, PROJECT, AND PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2017, 182 :466-473
[89]   Fortune favors the prepared: How SMEs approach business model innovations in Industry 4.0 [J].
Mueller, Julian Marius ;
Buliga, Oana ;
Voigt, Kai-Ingo .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2018, 132 :2-17
[90]   What Drives the Implementation of Industry 4.0? The Role of Opportunities and Challenges in the Context of Sustainability [J].
Mueller, Julian Marius ;
Kiel, Daniel ;
Voigt, Kai-Ingo .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (01)