Bayesian Hierarchical Random Effects Models in Forensic Science

被引:12
作者
Aitken, Colin G. G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Math, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Maxwell Inst, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Bayes' Theorem; evidence evaluation; forensic science; hierarchical models; likelihood ratios; random effects; SAILR; statistics; LIKELIHOOD RATIO; 2-LEVEL MODEL; EVALUATION RESPONSE; EVIDENTIAL VALUE; TRACE EVIDENCE; PROPOSITIONS; PROBABILITY; COCAINE;
D O I
10.3389/fgene.2018.00126
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Statistical modeling of the evaluation of evidence with the use of the likelihood ratio has a long history. It dates from the Dreyfus case at the end of the nineteenth century through the work at Bletchley Park in the Second World War to the present day. The development received a significant boost in 1977 with a seminal work by Dennis Lindley which introduced a Bayesian hierarchical random effects model for the evaluation of evidence with an example of refractive index measurements on fragments of glass. Many models have been developed since then. The methods have now been sufficiently well-developed and have become so widespread that it is timely to try and provide a software package to assist in their implementation. With that in mind, a project (SAILR: Software for the Analysis and Implementation of Likelihood Ratios) was funded by the European Network of Forensic Science Institutes through their Monopoly programme to develop a software package for use by forensic scientists world-wide that would assist in the statistical analysis and implementation of the approach based on likelihood ratios. It is the purpose of this document to provide a short review of a small part of this history. The review also provides a background, or landscape, for the development of some of the models within the SAILR package and references to SAILR as made as appropriate.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   The evaluation of evidence for exponentially distributed data [J].
Aitken, C. G. G. ;
Shen, Q. ;
Jensen, R. ;
Hayes, B. .
COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2007, 51 (12) :5682-5693
[2]   Evaluation of transfer evidence for three-level multivariate data with the use of graphical models [J].
Aitken, C. G. G. ;
Lucy, D. ;
Zadora, G. ;
Curran, J. M. .
COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2006, 50 (10) :2571-2588
[3]  
Aitken C. G. G., 2015, STAT APPL ITAL J APP, V27, P213
[4]  
Aitken C.G.G., 1991, The use of Statistics in Forensic Science
[5]  
Aitken C.G. G., 2020, Statistics and the evaluation of evidence for forensic scientists
[6]   Evaluation of trace evidence in the form of multivariate data [J].
Aitken, CGG ;
Lucy, D .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS, 2004, 53 :109-122
[7]   Letter to the Editor-The Roles of Participants' Differing Background Information in the Evaluation of Evidence [J].
Aitken, Colin ;
Nordgaard, Anders .
JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2018, 63 (02) :648-649
[8]   Evidence evaluation for discrete data [J].
Aitken, Colin ;
Gold, Erica .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 230 (1-3) :147-155
[9]   A two-level model for evidence evaluation [J].
Aitken, Colin G. G. ;
Zadora, Grzegorz ;
Lucy, David .
JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2007, 52 (02) :412-419
[10]   Posterior likelihood ratios for evaluation of forensic trace evidence given a two-level model on the data [J].
Alberink, Ivo ;
Bolck, Annabel ;
Menges, Sonja .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2013, 40 (12) :2579-2600