Benefits of Computational Thinking in Entrepreneurship

被引:2
作者
Nuar, Ahmad Najmi Amerhaider [1 ]
Ahd Ronan, Mohd Zaidi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Dept Informat Syst, Skudai 81300, Johor Bahru, Malaysia
来源
2019 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS: EMPOWERING DIGITAL INNOVATION (ICRIIS 2019) | 2019年
关键词
computational thinking; industry; 4.0; automation; entrepreneurship; small and medium enterprise; INDUSTRY; 4.0; OPPORTUNITIES; K-12;
D O I
10.1109/icriis48246.2019.9073671
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Computational thinking is an essential skill that allows humans to solve a complex problem that later on can be understood by computers and humans. Abstraction and automation are the core of computational thinking. Therefore, CT is the key skill in Industry 4.0. However, in Malaysia's manufacturing, only 50 percent of SMEs deploy automation. Automation can make the company more efficient, more accurate and decrease human error. CT was built based on 4 basic pillars which are abstraction, decomposition, algorithm and pattern recognition. These pillars will encourage automation, efficiency, and innovation. Moreover, one of the benefits of CT for non-programmer is the formulated problem can be passed on to information-processing agents such as third-party companies or freelancers who can create the solution. In this paper, we review the benefits of computational thinking in entrepreneurship in the context of Industry 4.0.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Learning Computational Thinking Without a Computer: How Computational Participation Happens in a Computational Thinking Board Game
    Wei-Chen Kuo
    Ting-Chia Hsu
    The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 2020, 29 : 67 - 83
  • [32] Computational Thinking, Inferential Thinking and "Big Data"
    Jordan, Michael I.
    PODS'15: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 33RD ACM SYMPOSIUM ON PRINCIPLES OF DATABASE SYSTEMS, 2015, : 1 - 1
  • [33] Computational What? Relating Computational Thinking to Teaching
    Kale U.
    Akcaoglu M.
    Cullen T.
    Goh D.
    Devine L.
    Calvert N.
    Grise K.
    TechTrends, 2018, 62 (6) : 574 - 584
  • [34] Understanding Student Computational Thinking with Computational Modeling
    Aiken, John M.
    Caballero, Marcos D.
    Douglas, Scott S.
    Burk, John B.
    Scanlon, Erin M.
    Thoms, Brian D.
    Schatz, Michael F.
    2012 PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH CONFERENCE, 2013, 1513 : 46 - 49
  • [35] Empowering K-12 pupils: Fostering problem-solving skills through sustainable entrepreneurship and computational thinking
    Bentz, Anette
    Krasowski, Jonas
    Standl, Bernhard
    Wiepcke, Claudia
    JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SMALL BUSINESS, 2024,
  • [36] Development and Application of Computational Thinking and Computational Methods
    Zhang, Xiaofeng
    Zou, Hailin
    ADVANCING KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING TECHNOLOGIES, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 125 - 128
  • [37] Instructional interventions for computational thinking: Examining the link between computational thinking and academic performance
    Lemay, David John
    Basnet, Ram B.
    Doleck, Tenzin
    Bazelais, Paul
    Saxena, Anoop
    COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION OPEN, 2021, 2
  • [38] Complex thinking to computational thinking: contemporary challenges in education
    Balladares Burgos, Jorge Antonio
    Aviles Salvador, Mauro Rodrigo
    Perez Narvaez, Hamilton Omar
    SOPHIA-COLECCION DE FILOSOFIA DE LA EDUCACION, 2016, (21): : 143 - 159
  • [39] Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the Computational Thinking Test
    Roman-Gonzalez, Marcos
    Perez-Gonzalez, Juan-Carlos
    Jimenez-Fernandez, Carmen
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2017, 72 : 678 - 691
  • [40] Computational Thinking Is More about Thinking than Computing
    Yeping Li
    Alan H. Schoenfeld
    Andrea A. diSessa
    Arthur C. Graesser
    Lisa C. Benson
    Lyn D. English
    Richard A. Duschl
    Journal for STEM Education Research, 2020, 3 (1) : 1 - 18