AN INITIAL COMPARISON OF ENERGY USE BETWEEN CRANE CONTROL METHODS

被引:0
|
作者
Vaughan, Joshua [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisiana Lafayette, Dept Mech Engn, Lafayette, LA 70504 USA
来源
7TH ANNUAL DYNAMIC SYSTEMS AND CONTROL CONFERENCE, 2014, VOL 3 | 2014年
关键词
DERIVATIVE FEEDBACK; REDUCTION; VIBRATION; SYSTEMS; DESIGN; INPUTS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Cranes have been used for transport of material since antiquity. Modern cranes still share some characteristics with the ancients, namely payload oscillation. As such, there has an extensive research effort to control crane payload vibration, resulting in the development of many effective methods. This paper compares two popular methods of crane vibration control, feedback control and input shaping. In addition to showing that both of these methods can dramatically reduce payload oscillation, one primary measure used in this comparison is energy use. The differing nature of the control methods is shown to result in different energy use profiles. This is shown to be true even for when the payload responses for the two controllers are similar
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison between Zero power Control Methods of Spiral motor
    Koyama, Masato
    Fujimoto, Yasutaka
    39TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS SOCIETY (IECON 2013), 2013, : 5876 - 5881
  • [2] Input shaping for non-zero initial conditions and arbitrary input signals with an application to overhead crane control
    Wahrburg, Arne
    Jurvanen, Janne
    Niemela, Matias
    Holmberg, Mikael
    2022 IEEE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED MOTION CONTROL (AMC), 2022, : 36 - 41
  • [3] Initial Investigations of Hand-Motion Crane Control with Double-Pendulum Payloads
    Peng, Kelvin Chen Chih
    Singhose, William
    Gurleyuk, Sirri Sunay
    2012 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ACC), 2012, : 6270 - 6275
  • [4] The comparison of some advanced control methods for energy optimization and comfort management in buildings
    Esmaeilzadeh, Ahmad
    Zakerzadeh, Mohammad Reza
    Koma, Aghil Yousefi
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2018, 43 : 601 - 623
  • [5] Visual comfort and energy use reduction comparison for different shading and lighting control strategies in a small office building
    Vanage, Soham
    Dong, Hao
    Cetin, Kristen
    SOLAR ENERGY, 2023, 265
  • [6] A Methodological Comparison between Energy and Environmental Performance Evaluation
    Pagliaro, Francesca
    Cellucci, Lucia
    Burattini, Chiara
    Bisegna, Fabio
    Gugliermetti, Franco
    Vollaro, Andrea de Lieto
    Salata, Ferdinando
    Golasi, Iacopo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 7 (08): : 10324 - 10342
  • [7] Comparison between conventional human energy measurement and physical human energy measurement methods in wetland rice production
    Elsoragaby, Suha
    Yahya, Azmi
    Nawi, Nazmi Mat
    Mahadi, Muhammad Razif
    Mairghany, Modather
    Muazu, A.
    Shukery, Mohamad Firdza
    HELIYON, 2020, 6 (11)
  • [8] Comparison between exergy and energy analysis for biodiesel production
    Amelio, A.
    Van de Voorde, T.
    Creemers, C.
    Degreve, J.
    Darvishmanesh, S.
    Luis, P.
    Van der Bruggen, B.
    ENERGY, 2016, 98 : 135 - 145
  • [9] Comparison of modeling methods and parametric study for a piezoelectric wind energy harvester
    Zhao, Liya
    Tang, Lihua
    Yang, Yaowen
    SMART MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES, 2013, 22 (12)
  • [10] A Comparison of Voltage Regulation and Control Methods
    Afandi, Izzah
    Ciufo, Philip
    Agalgaonkar, Ashish
    Perera, Sarath
    2015 AUSTRALASIAN UNIVERSITIES POWER ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (AUPEC), 2015,