Extended statistical entropy analysis (eSEA) for improving the evaluation of Austrian wastewater treatment plants

被引:14
作者
Sobantka, A. [1 ]
Rechberger, H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Vienna Univ Technol, CWRS, A-1040 Vienna, Austria
[2] Vienna Univ Technol, Inst Water Qual Resource & Waste Management, A-1040 Vienna, Austria
关键词
cost-efficiency; energy-efficiency; evaluation method; nitrogen removal; statistical entropy; wastewater treatment; BENCHMARKING; MANAGEMENT; EMISSIONS; NITROGEN;
D O I
10.2166/wst.2013.665
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Extended statistical entropy analysis (eSEA) is used to evaluate the nitrogen (N) budgets of 13 Austrian wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). The eSEA results are then compared to the WWTPs specific N-removal rates. Among the five WWTPs that achieve a removal rate of 75% the eSEA detects significant differences in the N-performance. The main reason for this is that eSEA considers all N-species and seems to be more discriminating than the N-removal rate. Additionally, the energy consumption and the costs of the mechanical-biological treatment process are related to the N-performance according to the eSEA. The influence of the WWTP size on the energy-and cost-efficiency of the N-treatment is investigated. Results indicate that energy-efficiency does not necessarily coincide with cost-efficiency. It is shown that smaller WWTPs between 22,000 PE (population equivalents) and 50,000 PE can be operated as energy-efficiently as larger WWTPs between 100,000 and 1,000,000 PE. On average, the smaller plants operate less costefficiently than the large ones. This research offers a new method for the assessment of the N-performance of WWTPs, and suggests that small WWTPs are not necessarily less energy-and cost-efficient than large ones.
引用
收藏
页码:1051 / 1057
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Agis H., 2002, WIENER MITTEILUNGEN, V176, P133, DOI DOI 10.2166/wst.2006.413
[2]  
Austrian Ministry of Agriculture Forestry Environment and Water, 2001, 911 AUSTR MIN AGR FO
[3]   Including greenhouse gas emissions during benchmarking of wastewater treatment plant control strategies [J].
Flores-Alsina, Xavier ;
Corominas, Lluis ;
Snip, Laura ;
Vanrolleghem, Peter A. .
WATER RESEARCH, 2011, 45 (16) :4700-4710
[4]  
Guinee J.B., 2004, HDB LIFE CYCLE ASSES, DOI DOI 10.1007/0-306-48055-7
[5]   Technical efficiency and cost analysis in wastewater treatment processes: A DEA approach [J].
Hernandez-Sancho, Francesc ;
Sala-Garrido, Ramon .
DESALINATION, 2009, 249 (01) :230-234
[6]   Nitrous oxide emission during wastewater treatment [J].
Kampschreur, Marlies J. ;
Temmink, Hardy ;
Kleerebezem, Robbert ;
Jetten, Mike S. M. ;
van Loosdrecht, Mark C. M. .
WATER RESEARCH, 2009, 43 (17) :4093-4103
[7]  
Kaufman S, 2008, P NAWTEC16 16 ANN N
[8]   Energiebedarf von AbwasserreinigungsanlagenThe power consumption of sewage treatment plants [J].
H. Kroiss ;
K. Svardal .
Österreichische Wasser- und Abfallwirtschaft, 2009, 61 (11-12)
[9]  
Kroiss H., 2007, ABSCHATZUNG VERANDER
[10]   The concept of sustainable urban water management [J].
Larsen, TA ;
Gujer, W .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 35 (09) :3-10