Multiple flood vulnerability assessment approach based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method and coordinated development degree model

被引:112
作者
Yang, Weichao [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Kui [1 ,2 ]
Lian, Jijian [1 ,2 ]
Bin, Lingling [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Chao [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, State Key Lab Hydraul Engn Simulat & Safety, Tianjin 300350, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Tianjin, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Multiple flood vulnerability; Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method; Coordinated development degree model; Multiple perspectives; SOCIAL VULNERABILITY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; INDEX; PERFORMANCE; AHP;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.085
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Flood is a serious challenge that increasingly affects the residents as well as policymakers. Flood vulnerability assessment is becoming gradually relevant in the world. The purpose of this study is to develop an approach to reveal the relationship between exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity for better flood vulnerability assessment, based on the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method (FCEM) and coordinated development degree model (CDDM). The approach is organized into three parts: establishment of index system, assessment of exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity, and multiple flood vulnerability assessment. Hydrodynamic model and statistical data are employed for the establishment of index system; FCEM is used to evaluate exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity; and CDDM is applied to express the relationship of the three components of vulnerability. Six multiple flood vulnerability types and four levels are proposed to assess flood vulnerability from multiple perspectives. Then the approach is applied to assess the spatiality of flood vulnerability in Hainan's eastern area, China. Based on the results of multiple flood vulnerability, a decision-making process for rational allocation of limited resources is proposed and applied to the study area. The study shows that multiple flood vulnerability assessment can evaluate vulnerability more completely, and help decision makers learn more information about making decisions in a more comprehensive way. In summary, this study provides a new way for flood vulnerability assessment and disaster prevention decision. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:440 / 450
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Vulnerability [J].
Adger, W. Neil .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2006, 16 (03) :268-281
[2]  
[Anonymous], WORKING PAPER
[3]   Global warming-induced upper-ocean freshening and the intensification of super typhoons [J].
Balaguru, Karthik ;
Foltz, Gregory R. ;
Leung, L. Ruby ;
Emanuel, Kerry A. .
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2016, 7
[4]   A flood vulnerability index for coastal cities and its use in assessing climate change impacts [J].
Balica, S. F. ;
Wright, N. G. ;
van der Meulen, F. .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2012, 64 (01) :73-105
[5]   Assessing urban flooding vulnerability with an emergy approach [J].
Chang, Li-Fang ;
Huang, Shu-Li .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2015, 143 :11-24
[6]   Evaluating teaching performance based on fuzzy AHP and comprehensive evaluation approach [J].
Chen, Jeng-Fung ;
Hsieh, Ho-Nien ;
Do, Quang Hung .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2015, 28 :100-108
[7]   Evaluation of Green Port Factors and Performance: A Fuzzy AHP Analysis [J].
Chiu, Rong-Her ;
Lin, Le-Hui ;
Ting, Shih-Chan .
MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2014, 2014
[8]   Social vulnerability to environmental hazards [J].
Cutter, SL ;
Boruff, BJ ;
Shirley, WL .
SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2003, 84 (02) :242-261
[9]   Multiple Attribute Decision Making Based on Cross-Evaluation with Uncertain Decision Parameters [J].
Ding, Tao ;
Liang, Liang ;
Yang, Min ;
Wu, Huaqing .
MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2016, 2016
[10]   Validation of a social vulnerability index in context to river-floods in Germany [J].
Fekete, A. .
NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2009, 9 (02) :393-403